Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Geopolitics Watch: Would Kim Jong Un Accept Senate Democrats Denuclearization Demands?

◎ The Democrats’ demands may end up helping Trump to seal a historic denuclearization and peace deal with Kim Jong Un.

In a letter to United States President Donald Trump, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and other top Senate Democrats listed five demands that North Korea must meet before they would approve the lifting of sanctions on Pyongyang.

The demands include:
1) Dismantle or remove every single one of North Korea’s nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons;

2) End the production and enrichment of uranium and plutonium for military purposes, and permanently dismantle North Korea’s nuclear weapons infrastructure. This includes the destruction of test sites, all nuclear weapons research and development facilities and enrichment facilities;

3) Suspend all of North Korea’s ballistic missile tests and disable, dismantle and eliminate all of North Korea’s ballistic missiles and programs;

4) Commit to robust compliance inspections including a verification regime for North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Inspections must have complete access to all nuclear-related sites and facilities with real-time verification of North Korean compliance. A separate compliance regime for its chemical and biological weapons that prevents, detects and punishes cheating on the part of North Korea is also necessary. These compliance regimes must include “anywhere, anytime” inspections and snap-back sanctions if North Korea is not in full compliance;

5) North Korea’s actions to denuclearize and dismantle ballistic missiles and programs must be permanent.

The letter, which was sent on June 4, also urged Trump to “maintain a tough approach to China” and see that it “will do all it can to help secure an agreement and then insist on strict North Korean compliance with such an agreement.”

Trump needs support from the Democrats to pass legislation in the 100-seat Senate since most legislation requires 60 votes to pass and Republicans only hold 51 seats.

The big picture:
The letter from top Senate Democrats comes as Trump prepares for a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore on June 12. The Singapore summit was briefly in doubt when Trump canceled it on May 24 in the wake of North Korea’s threats to withdraw in mid-May. However, U.S. and North Korean officials continued to hold preparatory talks in Singapore, North Korea, and America. On June 1, Trump confirmed that the meeting would take place as originally planned.

The Democrats have been blocking Trump on policy and personnel appointments since he came to office in 2017. In a weekly address on June 2, Trump said that over 300 of his nominees are still awaiting confirmation.

Meanwhile, Sino-U.S. trade talks appear to have reached an impasse. China unilaterally released a statement after the third round of discussions in Beijing from June 2 to June 3, while the Trump administration has stayed silent at the time of writing. According to The Wall Street Journal, China offered at the Beijing talks to buy nearly $70 billion worth of U.S. agriculture and energy products if the Trump administration does not proceed with planned tariffs. State Council vice premier Liu He told U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross that the deal would be void if the U.S. imposes $50 billion of tariffs on Chinese goods after a list is released by June 15. U.S. officials remain skeptical of the deal, and nothing has been signed yet according to the Journal. While the Trump administration is looking to greatly reduce America’s trade deficit with China, it ultimately wants China to commit to making structural changes to its economy, guarantee intellectual property protection, and end the practice of forced technology transfers.

Our take:
The Senate Democrats’ list of demands appears to add a further complication to the Trump administration’s denuclearization negotiations with North Korea. Conventional wisdom suggests that the stringent demands would almost certainly torpedo Trump’s diplomatic effort. Given prior and ongoing Democrat obstruction, it cannot be ruled out that the release of the demands close to the Singapore summit is an attempt to set Trump up for failure with North Korea.

Based on our reading of the situation, however, we believe that the Democrats’ demands may end up helping Trump to seal a historic denuclearization and peace deal with Kim Jong Un. An examination of the issue from the perspective of the interests of the three major players in the North Korean crisis follows.

The U.S.
Trump and top officials in his administration have repeatedly said that they want North Korea’s denuclearization to be complete, verifiable, and irreversible (CVID). And until Pyongyang commits to CVID, the “maximum pressure” campaign against North Korea would not be lifted. White House National Security Advisor John Bolton said in a television interview in May that the U.S. would also talk to North Korea about giving up its ballistic missile program, as well as chemical and biological weapons. To date, there is no indication that the Trump administration is backtracking from its denuclearization demands.

Meanwhile, the mainstream view of Trump on North Korea is that he may cut any deal with the North Koreans to win the Nobel Peace Prize. The Senate Democrats’ demands seem to reflect those mainstream “concerns,” but in reality they are not asking for Trump to do anything more than what his administration has already said publicly. In other words, the Democrats are openly calling bluff on Trump.

The Democrats, however, may have unwittingly guaranteed Trump’s success with North Korea by removing his negotiating room. Without the Senate Democrats threatening never to end sanctions against North Korea unless their demands are met, Kim Jong Un and South Korean president Moon Jae-in could still push Trump to settle for a less comprehensive denuclearization deal (not removing chemical and biological weapons, for example). Now Trump can tell Kim and Moon that the specifics of North Korean denuclearization and the continued imposing of sanctions are entirely out of his hands due to the design of America’s political system. All Kim can do is accept the Democrats’ (really Trump’s) demands and set North Korea on the path of historic change, or reject the demands and await regime collapse.

Of course, there is a good chance that the Trump administration would insist upon the same tough denuclearization demands without the Democrats list given what the administration has already said publicly. But in that scenario, North Korea and South Korea have more wriggle room to bargain.

North Korea
We earlier analyzed that North Korea would agree to CVID given its failing economy and Kim Jong Un’s worries about regime survival. Recent developments further affirm our analysis:

  • While North Korea appeared to do an “about-face” on denuclearization by abruptly pulling out of high-level talks with South Korea and threatening to withdraw from the Singapore summit, it just as quickly relented after Trump announced the cancellation of the summit. Kim Jong Un hurried to Panmunjom for another meeting with Moon Jae-in, while North Korean officials scrambled to hold talks on the summit with U.S. diplomats in North Korea and Singapore. Kim also dispatched his second-in-command to meet with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and personally hand a letter to Trump; Trump had instructed Kim to call or write him if he was still interested in the Singapore summit.
  • In April, North Korean officials were made to watch a documentary which featured Kim Jong Un standing on a shoreline with tears streaming down his cheeks. The narrator noted that Kim was “distraught over his inability to radically overhaul the economy to make the reclusive country a vibrant power.” Kim’s show of weakness would be shocking to North Koreans, who are told to worship him and his family as gods. The propaganda film appears to send the message to officials that they should rally behind Kim on economic development and the halting of nuclear testing as per his announcement during an April meeting of the North Korean Worker’s Party. Kim’s tears are very likely part of his attempt to sell denuclearization to his people.
  • Kim Jong Un recently sacked three older and more conservative top military officers while appointing three younger officers who are known for their unquestioning loyalty as their replacements. The personnel changes suggest that Kim fears a military coup while he is in Singapore, and that he needs loyalists who would agree to changes that he might make to North Korea’s nuclear doctrine after his summit with Trump.
  • While in Singapore, Kim wants to stay at the Fullerton, a five-star hotel that charges over $6,000 a night for a presidential suite. North Korea, however, apparently cannot afford the bill and may need others to help pay for his hotel stay. Also, Kim may have to borrow another country’s plane or make a stopover in China in his Soviet-era plane due to concerns that it might not be able to make the 3,000-mile trip.

Kim seems to have only two options in talks with Trump. He can either agree to the Democrats’ list of denuclearization demands and preserve his rule, or reject the demands and court war by continuing with his nuclear provocations. Kim would almost certainly try to cut a more favorable deal with Trump, but his not being able to afford a hotel stay in Singapore seems to indicate that he might not have anything substantial to bargain with. Also, it is unlikely that Kim would get help from Xi Jinping to pressure Trump given that Xi has his own troubles with the U.S. over trade.

We previously wrote that China cannot withstand a trade war with the U.S., and that Xi Jinping would do anything to delay a trade conflict to buy time to fix China’s economic and financial sector woes. A bond default tsunami; mounting debt crisis in the provinces; China’s foreign reserves seeing a U.S. dollar shortage; and the Hong Kong government repeatedly buying Hong Kong dollars to prop up the currency offer a glimpse at the ills plaguing China’s economy. Xi’s headaches are compounded by the coming U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports and Chinese telecommunications equipment maker ZTE being unable to get a reprieve from a seven-year U.S. business ban. Indeed, China’s offer to buy $70 billion worth of American agriculture and energy products in exchange for a suspension of $50 billion of tariffs hints at Beijing’s desperation.

The Chinese Communist Party has staked its political legitimacy on China’s economic performance, and it is now facing a crisis of regime survival. Facing U.S. trade and intellectual property pressure, there is virtually no chance that the CCP would intercede on behalf of the North Korean regime in its denuclearization negotiations with America. (See: “Decoding China’s Statement on Sino-US Trade Talks“)

What’s next:
1. In Singapore, Kim Jong Un should agree to a framework of denuclearization that is based on the Senate Democrats’ list of demands. In exchange, Trump could offer details of the security guarantees that America can provide to Kim, and outline how the U.S. could set North Korea on the path of economic prosperity. Success would hinge on Kim’s willingness to trust Trump.

The Democrats may claim credit for a successful denuclearization deal, but there is nothing in their demands that exceed what Trump and his top officials have already been saying. Kim’s biggest headache would be selling the deal to the North Korean officials and people.

2. Xi Jinping should continue to cooperate with Trump on North Korea in hopes of holding off tariffs for as long as possible and rescuing ZTE from a very embarrassing and painful collapse. Xi’s political rivals, however, may find ways to undermine him and drive a wedge between him and Trump.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University