Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: US ZTE Ban Exposes China’s Tech Industry Vulnerabilities

◎ American action against ZTE and Huawei is in line with Trump’s National Security Strategy.


On April 16, the United States Department of Commerce banned American companies from selling services, software, or components to ZTE Corp, a state-supported Chinese telecommunications manufacturer, for seven years (until 2025, March 13).

The ban was imposed because ZTE broke an agreement reached with the U.S. government after it was caught illegally shipping U.S. goods and technology to Iran and North Korea. The Commerce Department noted that ZTE lied to the U.S. government about taking action against the 39 employees involved in the violations. Instead of punishing all the employees, ZTE had only fired four and gave the others full bonuses without disciplining them.

ZTE has already paid $890 million in fines and penalties. The U.S. government could impose an additional $300 million.

On April 17, ZTE suspended trading of its shares in the Hong Kong and Shanghai stock exchanges. Shares of companies in business with ZTE plunged that day.

The backdrop:
1. Huawei chairman Eric Xu said at a tech event in Shenzhen on April 17 that while 5G was faster and more reliable, consumers would experience no “material difference between the two technologies,” according to a Financial Times report on April 18. Xu’s remarks represent a departure of sorts from the state rhetoric of how the swift advancements in China’s 5G would see it overtake America and lead the world.

2. On April 18, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced temporary tariffs of 179 percent on U.S. sorghum imports.

3. On April 17, the Federal Communications Commission voted in favor of blocking federal funds from being spent with companies that are considered a national security risk, such as Huawei and ZTE.

4. The U.S. trade representative office is considering a complaint under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 against China’s restrictions of U.S. cloud computing providers and other high-tech services, according to The Wall Street Journal. Chinese companies like Alibaba could be hit if the U.S. moves for reciprocity.

5. On April 16, the United Kingdom’s National Cyber Security Centre warned UK telecoms providers that ZTE equipment and services could pose a national security risk. In February, the Australian Department of Defence confirmed that it is phasing out ZTE equipment and has stopped using Huawei phones.

Our take:
1. American action against ZTE and Huawei is in line with Trump’s National Security Strategy. Per our earlier analysis, the “Made in China 2025” strategy is part of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) plan for economic expansion. The CCP is also pushing its 5G development and growing its high-tech industry (AI, Big Data, etc.) as it seeks new battlegrounds to best the U.S.

2. In our 2017 China semiconductor development report, we noted that China’s semiconductor industry vulnerabilities include lack of high-end semiconductor technology and talent; official corruption and immorality; and technology theft. The recent sanctioning of ZTE, China’s second largest telecom equipment maker and the world’s fourth largest, corroborates our analysis. ZTE is now on the brink of a disaster.

3. The ZTE ban exposes a major weakness in China’s tech sector—a deep dependence on the U.S. Because ZTE is reliant on American microchips and software (Android), it may have to redesign up to 90 percent of its product line, according to The New York Times.

4. The ZTE case has debunked CCP propaganda regarding the strength of China’s tech industry, and forced the propagandists to eat humble pie. Three days after the ZTE ban, the Propaganda Department’s sudden stopped promoting “Amazing China” (li hai, wo de guo, or literally, “My Country is Awesome”) a documentary film about China’s “glorious achievements” in tech over the last five years. The documentary also appeared to be censored, and is no longer available in cinemas or on video platforms in China.

5. Ironically, boisterous CCP propaganda about its tech primacy has alarmed the international community and put many nations on the defensive. Yet the CCP rhetoric was born out of necessity. As China’s economic and social problems pile up, the CCP can only turn to shallow nationalism to distract and deceive the Chinese people and safeguard its ruling legitimacy.

6. The CCP has perhaps grossly underestimated President Donald Trump’s resolve on matters of national security. When Trump ramps up the pressure and when American society at large is more aware of the threat the CCP poses to the U.S., the CCP’s past schemes would become ineffective.

7. We believe that the CCP will open up China’s markets further and provide more protection to intellectual property to stall for as long as possible stronger U.S. trade action. Also, Xi Jinping would likely push Kim Jong Un to accelerate the denuclearization of North Korea to secure a bargaining chip for use in Sino-U.S. trade talks.

Looking ahead:
Huawei, Alibaba, and Hikvision could be targeted next as America focuses on tackling national security risks.

"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University
Previous
Next