Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Politics Watch: Stricter Controls Over Society Signal Greater Crisis for the CCP

◎ Based on our research and understanding of the CCP, the more tightly it controls society, the more it feels imperiled.

Since the outbreak of the Sino-U.S. trade war in July, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been controlling Chinese society with ever-increasing strictness. The CCP’s clamp down on religion and freedom of speech have been particularly severe, and it seems to be “maintaining stability” as though it is beleaguered.

Based on our research and understanding of the CCP, the more tightly it controls society, the more it feels imperiled.

The backdrop:
Religion control
1. In the morning of Aug. 27, the abbot of the Shaolin Temple in Henan Province assembled the temple’s monks for a ceremony to raise the CCP red flag on temple grounds. The heads of the local CCP United Work Front Department (Li Li) and the Religion Bureau (Wu Song Tao) were among several officials present to observe the ceremony.

The flag raising at the Shaolin Temple was carried out in accordance with an initiative to “raise the national flag at religious sites” that was proposed at a national-level religious organization meeting on July 31. On Aug. 15, the CCP Buddhist Association studied the initiative at a key meeting in Beijing.

The mandated flag raising is highly symbolic as the CCP is forcing religious groups to show obeisance to and accept domination by an atheist authority.

2. The CCP has recently intensified the suppression of Christians across China, according to the Chinese Christian Fellowship of Righteousness, a group that tracks the persecution of Christians in China. The Fellowship notes that the CCP crackdown includes destroying crosses in churches and replacing them with the CCP red flag and images of CCP leaders; monitoring the content of sermons; “sinicizing Christianity”; introducing “socialist values” into churches; forcing Christians to sign an “undertaking to stop believing in Christianity”; and forcibly demolishing churches.

Suppression in Henan Province, where there is a large population of Christians, has been particularly heavy-handed. For instance, 56 of the 90-plus churches (not including underground churches) in Zhengzhou City, the capital of Henan, have been forcibly closed to date.

3. According to, a clearinghouse for information about the persecution of Falun Gong, at least 275 Falun Gong adherents in 25 provinces were arrested in July. The regions with the most arrests are Liaoning (61), Jilin (38), Shandong (31), Hebei (21), Hunan (16), Guangdong (13), and Henan (12).

Between Aug. 22 to Aug. 23, police officers from 10 cities in Liaoning Province arrested 42 Falun Gong adherents and four of their family members.

4. According to a report in Foreign Policy magazine, “state policy treats all Uyghurs as likely opponents of the party” since Chen Quanguo became Xinjiang’s Party secretary in August 2016. Around 1 million Uyghurs have been vanished and interned in re-education camps, where they are indoctrinated to “love” the CCP.

Several Xinjiang residents told the Chinese language edition of The Epoch Times in an anonymous interview that the local authorities are not focused on growing the economy but on “maintaining stability.” Concentration camps are being constructed everywhere “to a point where foreigners might find unimaginable.” The Xinjiang residents also said that the CCP is forcing Uyghur Muslims to smoke and drink against their religion, and would send to re-education camp those who refuse to comply with their orders.

Speech control
1. Recently, a notice that is reportedly from Henan’s Zhumadian City Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission made the rounds on Chinese social media. Dated Aug. 27, the notice requires all work units in the city to submit hard copy name lists of “Big Vs” (verified accounts of influential Weibo users) to the Commission by Aug. 30. The lists should include “Big Vs” with over 10,000 followers or those who people pay particular attention to.

An Aug. 27 notice on Weibo “Big Vs” by Henan’s Zhumadian City Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission.

In July, Chen Jie, a prominent media professional and “Big V,” was arrested on charges of “operating an illegal business” and carrying out “extortion and blackmail.” Before his arrest, Chen had been exposing and criticizing Chinese officials who had engaged in fraudulent and corrupt activities. His arrest attracted great public interest. In August, state mouthpiece Xinhua published a nearly 5,000 word-long, “sentence before trial” article listing Chen Jie’s “crimes.”

2. The number of netizens who have been arrested for online speech is on the rise.

On Aug. 16, public security officers in Anhui’s Ma’anshan City arrested an 18-year-old Chinese male for “disorderly behavior.” The teenager, who used the online moniker “Sibodayetaijun,” had published an article titled “Abe is My Dad, You Mad?” where he wrote: “Ill-fate has me born in the wrong country. The result can only be a grim future. I must do more good deeds this life so that I can become Taiwanese or Japanese in the next life.”

Late at night on Aug. 23, people’s police from the Shenzhen Shajing Police Station in Guangdong forced their way into the home of a woman on the pretext of what she had published online. The incident was captured on video and circulated on the Chinese internet.

On Aug. 25, local police in Shandong’s Shouguang City arrested two women for “spreading rumors.” The women had been telling their friends and relatives in a WeChat group to “eat less pork and use more disinfectant at home.”

3. Several professors in China have lost their jobs for their speech.

On July 6, Wang Gang, an associate professor of clinical medicine at Hebei University of Engineering, was dismissed by the college. Wang had frequently criticized the government on WeChat.

On July 17, Christopher Balding, an American professor at Peking University’s HSBC School of Business in Shenzhen, said in a blog post that the college was not renewing his contract. “I know the unspoken reason for my dismissal. You do not work under the Communist Party without knowing the risks,” he wrote in his blog. Balding has been outspoken about the authoritarian Chinese regime on social media and other forums.

On Aug. 16, Yang Shaozheng, a professor at Guizhou University’s School of Economics, was officially sacked. One of the reasons for Yang’s dismissal was publishing and disseminating “incorrect speech of the political nature.” Yang had previously written an article where he asserted that the estimated 20 trillion yuan spent on the 20 million-odd professional Party cadres and non-Party workers was a “societal waste.” His article caused a stir when it was published.

The big picture:
Sino-U.S. trade tensions continue to worsen. Vice ministerial-level talks on Aug. 22 and Aug. 23 in Washington D.C. did not yield any progress. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump is preparing to go ahead with 25 percent tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports immediately after a public-comment period is over on Sept. 6, according to Bloomberg News.

On Aug. 24, Trump abruptly canceled Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s visit to North Korea, citing China’s unwillingness to help with the DPRK’s denuclearization process. “Secretary Pompeo looks forward to going to North Korea in the near future, most likely after our Trading relationship with China is resolved,” Trump tweeted.

Our take:
1. In our June 15 analysis, we wrote: “The U.S. tariffs heighten the political risk faced by the Xi Jinping administration. Xi’s political opponents and those who have reason to be unhappy with his rule would undoubtedly seize the opportunity to mount a counterattack. To curb anti-Xi forces, Xi may find it necessary to further tighten the Chinese regime’s control over society. Increased social control would lead to increased social tension, and further endangers the Xi administration.”

The stricter societal controls in China in recent months affirms our June analysis. The CCP’s clamp down on society is one of the outcomes of its misreading America’s policy shift and its strategy of gambling on the result of the U.S. midterm elections.

2. Before the beginning of the Sino-U.S. trade war, we wrote several articles analyzing why China would not be able to withstand a trade war (see here, here, here). A full-blown trade war would cause China’s economy to worsen further, resulting in inflation, increased capital outflows, higher food prices, and higher unemployment.

Recent mass peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platform failures and runaway private equity fund owners are sending “financial failure victims” out into the streets for protests. Also protesting are military veterans, victims of a toxic vaccine scandal, and civil servants whose paychecks were delayed. The various protests put pressure on the CCP’s “stability maintenance” apparatus and threaten to imperil CCP rule.

Per the CCP’s political culture, tightening control over society is a necessary evil to preserve power. The more danger the CCP feels, the more tightly it would squeeze society.

3. We believe that America and its allies would step up sanctions or stop doing business with the Chinese regime as they become clearer about the CCP threat. Capital will continue to leave China, and local governments in the regime would see their revenue plunge.

The CCP faces collapse when it does not have sufficient funds to sustain brutal “stability maintenance” operations. The CCP is likely acutely aware of this, and is hence tightening control over society now.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University