Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Geopolitics Watch: Is the PRC Isolating Taiwan, or is the PRC Being Isolated?

◎ America prioritizing its relations with the ROC over the PRC is a return to the post-WWII, pre-Nixon state of affairs.

A sweep of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) moves against the Republic of China (ROC) this year suggests that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is stepping up efforts to isolate Taiwan.

The United States’s shifting policy on China and Taiwan, however, indicates that it is the PRC, and not the ROC, that is at greater risk of being isolated on the world stage.

The backdrop:
Tsai visits Reagan Library and NASA
ROC president Tsai Ing-wen made two transit stops in the U.S. while on a diplomatic trip to Paraguay and Belize. Tsai’s stopover in the U.S. was her first since President Donald Trump signed the Taiwan Travel Act in March.

Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen speaks to Taiwanese American youths in Los Angeles on Aug. 13, 2018.

During Tsai’s first transit at Los Angeles on Aug. 13 and Aug. 14, she visited Taiwan’s de facto consulate in the city, met with Republican and Democratic members of Congress, spoke with crowds of Taiwanese Americans, and visited 85C, a Taiwanese coffee chain. Taiwanese media were allowed to follow her and report on her activities, a first.

Tsai also spoke at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library to American and Taiwanese media. She praised President Reagan for standing up for Taiwan, and noted that his observation that “everything was negotiable except two things: our freedom and our future” is a sentiment that “we Taiwanese feel now” with regard to cross-strait relations.

ROC president Tsai Ing-wen speaks at the Ronald Reagan Library in Los Angeles on Aug. 14, 2018.

Tsai stopped over in Houston on Aug. 19 for her return transit, and toured NASA’s mission control complex, the Johnson Space Center. Tsai became the first ROC president to visit the NASA facility, which mainland Chinese scientists are barred from visiting. In 2011, the U.S. Congress passed a spending bill that forbids NASA from working with the PRC due to high risk of espionage.

The PRC protested Tsai’s transit in the U.S.

The CCP woes Taiwan’s allies, harps on trifles
On Aug. 20, El Salvador announced that it was ending diplomatic ties with the ROC and switching its allegiance to the PRC. El Salvador joined Burkina Faso and the Dominican Republic this year in breaking off ties with Taipei in favor of diplomatic relations with Beijing. A total of five diplomatic allies have moved away from Taiwan since Tsai Ing-wen took office in 2016.

Joseph Wu, Taiwan’s foreign minister, told reporters that Taipei was unwilling to engage in “money competition” with the PRC. He said that El Salvador had been continuously asking for “massive funding support” since 2017 to develop its port, an “unsuitable project” that Taiwan had been unable to facilitate.

US ambassador to El Salvador Jean Manes tweeted that the country’s diplomatic move would “impact our relationship with the government.” In July, Manes warned that the PRC might have intentions of turning El Salvador’s La Union commercial port into a “military base.”

The PRC often makes the ROC an issue in its deal-making with other countries. In a joint statement between the UAE and the PRC when Chinese leader Xi Jinping visited Abu Dhabi on July 21, the UAE “expresses its unwavering commitment to the One-China Principle” and supports the PRC on “the Taiwan issue.” The UAE and the PRC signed several oil and trade deals, including two contracts worth $1.6 billion for seismic survey in the emirate between the state-owned Abu Dhabi National Oil Co and a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Company.

This year, the PRC has found plenty of excuses to target the ROC, including on seemingly trifling matters. Examples include:

April 25: The PRC’s civil aviation authorities demanded that foreign airlines change how they describe Taiwan on their websites or promotional material. White House spokesperson Sarah Sanders described the demand as “Chinese political correctness,” and added that it was “Orwellian nonsense and part of a growing trend by the Chinese Communist Party to impose its political views on American citizens and private companies.”

While many carriers compiled fully with the PRC’s order, American carriers waited until close to the deadline for the change before using creative means to adhere to the demand.

July 24: The East Asian Olympic Committee revoked Taichung City’s right to hold the first East Asian Youth Games in 2019, citing “political factors.” The PRC had earlier proposed a referendum on whether Taiwan should be referred to as such at the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo.

Aug. 2: Chinese netizens abruptly started accusing Taiwanese celebrity Vivian Sung of being “pro-Taiwan independence,” citing a 2015 interview Sung gave with a Taiwanese media where she said that her “most favorite country is Taiwan.” The sudden outpouring of vitriol towards Sung was widely covered in Chinese language media.

Aug. 14: Tsai Ing-wen is warmly received at a branch of Taiwanese cafe 85C in Los Angeles. Chinese netizens accuse 85C of being “pro-Taiwan independence,” and call for a boycott of its stores on the mainland. The parent company of 85C lost $120 million in stock value on the Taiwanese exchange that day, and the company apologized and said that it supported the “1992 Consensus.” The Consensus is the outcome of a meeting between PRC and ROC officials where they agreed that there is “one China,” but disagree on who rules it.

Our take:
The CCP has long resorted to low-key, salami-slicing tactics to isolate Taiwan internationally and make preparations to seize the island. Aside from the methods identified above, the CCP also uses military drills and a range of influence operations to condition Taiwan and the world of the eventuality of PRC takeover. For example, if international airliners list Taiwanese cities as part of China, then the PRC could claim after “reunifying” Taiwan and the mainland by force or other means that “international sentiment” is “widely in favor” of the PRC-led “reunification.” In the meantime, the airliners’ changed referencing of Taiwan allows the CCP to advance its narrative of cross-strait affairs and project an image of PRC dominance on the world stage.

This year, however, the CCP has stepped up its pace of salami-slicing to the point where it is blatant. Despite attracting unwanted global attention and criticism, the CCP appears to be willing to foot a steep financial and political cost to win over Taiwan’s allies. The CCP’s financial generosity is especially odd given the weakening of China’s economy this year—local governments face a debt crisis and cannot pay civil servants; state-owned firms have started defaulting on bonds; and the central government is finding fresh ways to fake data to hide the economic slowdown. Moreover, the CCP has come under strong domestic criticism this year for giving Belt and Road countries generous financial aid when there is a shortage of funds at home.

We believe that the CCP has increased the pace of isolating Taiwan because it needs to maintain the status quo of a CCP-hijacked world order and its international standing. The CCP also likely fears that America’s China policy revolution and closer U.S.-ROC ties would result in a new international order where the PRC is isolated.

Some have viewed Tsai Ing-wen’s transits in the U.S. as Washington’s willingness to play the “Taiwan card” against the PRC. We believe that a greater game is afoot. In previous articles, we analyzed how President Trump is “withdrawing America from the post-WWII world order and creating a new world system,” and how the passing of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) marks a critical turning point in Sino-U.S. relations. Senior U.S. officials have made statements which suggest a switch in America’s policy on China. For instance, Matt Pottinger, the senior director for Asia at the National Security Council, told U.S. business leaders that American “adjustment” towards China is “overdue” and “inevitable,” according to the Washington Post. He added that “what’s important now is for the United States and our partners to look forward to the 21st century competition that all of us are facing and that together we will be able to win.”

The high level of courtesy extended by the U.S. to Tsai Ing-wen during her transit in Los Angeles and Houston, as well as her visiting symbolic locations, are signs that the ROC may come to occupy a key position in the new geopolitical order that is being shaped by America. And should the Trump administration succeed in reshaping the present world order, then the PRC, and not the ROC, would be left isolated.

In a sense, America prioritizing its relations with the ROC over the PRC is a return to the post-WWII, pre-Nixon state of affairs. In 1942, the U.S., U.K., Soviet Union, and the ROC (not the PRC) signed the “Declaration by United Nations,” a document that served as the basis for the current United Nations. The ROC was also involved in drafting the UN Charter. The U.S., however, later recognized the PRC over the ROC under President Richard Nixon as a way for America to work with China in isolating the Soviet Union. In recent years, Henry Kissinger, Nixon’s former secretary of state, has advocated a “reverse Nixon” strategy to the Trump administration to counter a rising PRC, according to media reports.[1] Trump’s recent efforts to improve U.S.-Russia ties suggest that the “reverse Nixon” idea may have found purchase. Elevating the U.S.-ROC relationship seems like another aspect of America’s strategic shift.

(L-R) Anthony Eden (UK), Edward Stettinius (US), Vyacheslav Molotov (Soviet Union) and T. V. Soong (ROC) work on the UN Charter, on April 25, 1945.

In considering value systems, it is natural for the Trump administration to pivot away from the PRC and towards the ROC. Trump has criticized socialism and communism on several occasions, including his first speech at the UN. Meanwhile, Trump has placed a priority on free and reciprocal trade, and his administration’s Indo-Pacific economic vision calls for a “free and open Indo-Pacific.” Taiwan, an open, democratic society that retains authentic traditional Chinese culture, is more aligned closely to the U.S. values-wise than the PRC, an authoritarian, closed society that is brainwashed by pernicious Party culture.

What’s next:
The Trump administration should continue to elevate the U.S.-ROC relationship while it confronts “strategic competitor” PRC. America should also continue working to improve relations with the European Union, ASEAN nations, and Russia. Expect the CCP to mobilize its propaganda machinery and work diplomatic channels to counter Washington. Moreover, Taiwan’s “isolation” may “worsen” as the CCP wields the carrot and stick to court its allies and upkeep the global status quo.

Foreign investors must go beyond the surface of geopolitical developments and understand the deeper implications of evolving PRC-ROC-U.S. dynamics to sidestep risks and discover opportunities.

[1] Kissinger has denied that he advised Trump to do a “reverse Nixon.” According to a transcript of a Sept. 13 event commemorating the Wilson Centre’s 50th anniversary, Kissinger described the media report which makes the claim as “a great pieceof fiction” and added that he visualizes “China as a potential partner in the construction of a world order.”

Updated on Sept. 20, 2018.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University