Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: China’s Industrial Firms’ Profits Fell, Not Grew, in H1 2018

◎ China’s industrial firms’ profits actually fell 6.8 percent in the first quarter of the year.

According to China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) data released on July 27, the country’s industrial firms’ (“industrial enterprises above designated size”) profits grew 17.2 percent from the previous year.

We compared the 2018 figures with that from 2017, and found that China’s industrial firms’ profits actually fell 6.8 percent.

The statistics bureau’s official explanation for the 2018 figures was similar to those it made for data released earlier this year—changes in statistical methodology and sample size for calculations. Specifically for H1 2018 industrial profits, the NBS noted that a difference in the sample size had resulted in “the growth rate being calculated according to a comparable caliber.” This is the first year that the NBS has felt a need to explain the data discrepancy.

Source: National Bureau of Statistics (China)

The big picture:
China’s economy has severely worsened in 2018. The first half of the year has even seen some large-scale state-owned enterprises default on bonds, while several prominent foreign firms are gradually withdrawing from China.

Our take:
1. China’s economic woes have resulted in social problems (see here, here, here) that are threatening the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) ruling legitimacy. To keep up the illusion that the economy is still stable and steaming ahead, the CCP has to blatantly fudge figures.

China’s industrial firm economic data is an indicator that captures macro changes in the sector. Because there are bound to be dynamic changes in the sample size of industrial enterprises above a designated size each year, that means that past reported data are all erroneous if the growth rate has always been “calculated according to a comparable caliber” per the NBS’s claim.

2. The NBS data seems to run counter to the reports of company defaults and failures in recent months. Also, it is abnormal for the statistics bureau to publish a reported growth rate that differs from the actual growth rate when the latter rate has always been the one issued before 2018. It should be noted that the actual growth rate is itself problematic given the widespread practice of data fabrication by local governments.

The NBS probably feels that it can get away with blatant data manipulation because most foreign observers do not verify the official figures.

3. From the data in the table above, China’s industrial firms above designated size saw increased profits of 13 percent in 2017 but a drop in profits by 12 percent (actual growth rate) in 2018. This suggests that China’s real economy has shrunk rapidly.

Meanwhile, the profits of private and foreign investment enterprises, which increased by 14.8 percent and 18.9 percent respectively from a year ago, had fallen by to 25.2 percent and 5.2 percent respectively in H2.

The drop in private company profits is staggering. This suggests that the unemployment rate in China must have gone up because Chinese premier Li Keqiang told reporters in March that private enterprises account for half of the government tax revenue and 90 percent of new urban employment.

Only state-owned enterprises’ profits did not see negative actual growth rates (+27.2 percent) in H1 2018. Still, state-owned enterprises saw a profit margin of only 7.5 percent, or 1.3 percent higher than profit margins in H1 2017.

On the whole, the actual growth rate figures indicate that the CCP’s economic policy for industrial firms is stuck in the model where private enterprises are sacrificed over the promotion or protection of state-owned enterprises.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University