Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Geopolitics Watch: China is the Biggest Obstacle to Korea Peace and Denuclearization

◎ The Trump administration must utilize creative strategies and tactics to counter CCP propaganda and come out ahead on trade and North Korea.

On Aug. 24, President Donald Trump announced what could be a freeze in denuclearization talks between the United States, North Korea, and other parties.

In a thread on Twitter, Trump wrote: “I have asked Secretary of State Mike Pompeo not to go to North Korea, at this time, because I feel we are not making sufficient progress with respect to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula … Additionally, because of our much tougher Trading stance with China, I do not believe they are helping with the process of denuclearization as they once were (despite the UN Sanctions which are in place) … Secretary Pompeo looks forward to going to North Korea in the near future, most likely after our Trading relationship with China is resolved. In the meantime I would like to send my warmest regards and respect to Chairman Kim. I look forward to seeing him soon!”

Pompeo was originally scheduled to travel to North Korea with new special envoy Stephen Biegun in the week of Aug. 27. Biegun is Ford Motor Company’s vice president of international governmental affairs.

Trump’s tweets affirm our June 15 analysis of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) pivotal role in ensuring the successful denuclearization of the Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK). The tweets and the lack of visible progress at a recent meeting of PRC and U.S. trade officials also point toward the coming escalation of the Sino-U.S. trade dispute.

The backdrop:
Before Trump’s Aug. 24 announcement, there were promising signs of America and the two Koreas building trust and quietly progressing on the path towards peace and full denuclearization.

We earlier analyzed that the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the signing of a peace treaty hinges on mutual trust between the U.S. and the DPRK.

South Korea
In late July, senior South Korean officials talked about ending the Korean War “at the earliest possible date” and “within the year.” The officials noted that consultations on the topic were underway between the U.S., North Korea, and South Korea. Kang Kyung-wha, South Korea’s foreign ministry, floated the idea of declaring the end of the Korean War at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

On Aug. 13, North and South Korea officials held a high-level meeting and announced that leaders Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in would meet for a third summit in Pyongyang in September. Moon later announced plans to connect railroads in North and South Korea in 2018.

North Korea
Kim Jong Un has been touring factories and farms in North Korea since the Singapore Summit in June, likely to project the impression that he is focused on economic rebuilding. The lack of missile or nuclear tests in nine months adds to the impression that Kim is truly shifting away from the “byungjin” dual-track policy of developing nuclear weapons and the economy as he announced at a key political conclave in April.

Kim has also taken concrete steps to fulfill commitments made at the Singapore Summit in June.

On July 23, published satellite photos showing that North Korea had begun dismantling Sohae Satellite Launching Station, the missile engine testing site which Kim Jong Un promised Trump that he would take down in Singapore. However, 38North later published satellite photos from Aug. 16 which appear to show no further significant dismantlement activity since Aug. 3.

On July 27, 55 cases containing the remains of U.S. war dead and a dog tag arrived in Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. Forensic analysis indicated that the remains were likely those of American servicemen. The remains were later flown to Hawaii on Aug. 1 and received by Vice President Mike Pence.

Speaking at the Aspen Security Forum on July 22 about North Korea denuclearization and peace, General Vincent Brooks, U.S. forces commander in Korea, noted that “the lack of trust is the enemy we now have to defeat.”

At a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on July 25, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on North Korea that the Trump administration has “taken enormously constructive actions” that have put the U.S. “in a far better place than either of the previous two administrations.” He also noted that the Trump administration is engaged in “complex negotiation with a difficult adversary” and the administration’s moves concerning North Korea are “not going to be apparent to the world at the moment it is undertaken.”

Meanwhile, the appointment of Stephen Biegun as special envoy to North Korea suggests that the U.S. anticipates increased interaction with the DPRK beyond what Secretary Pompeo can personally undertake. Biegun’s private sector background also hints at future discussions with North Korea that could involve details about U.S. private sector investment after the country abandons its nuclear weapons, a point that Pompeo raised in a television interview in May.

Our take:
1) On June 15, we detailed in an article the potentially dire implications of U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods which President Trump announced after the Singapore Summit. In our analysis, we noted that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) political culture dictates that Xi Jinping would have to retaliate to Trump’s tariffs or “face serious challenges to his rule from rivals and the system.” Retaliation could take the form of “relaxing sanctions and secretly playing up Pyongyang’s suspicions of the U.S.”

Trump’s latest tweets and the recent rumors that Xi and his allies have been challenged by political rivals prove that our June 15 analysis is accurate.

Trump’s remark about sending Pompeo to North Korea “most likely after our Trading relationship with China is resolved” suggests that he now recognizes the PRC’s pivotal role in North Korean affairs. Going forward, the Trump administration would likely escalate the Sino-U.S. trade war through methods such as applying tariffs on all Chinese exports to America. The Trump administration could even apply pressure to the PRC on non-trade fronts.

2) Details of the latest round of Sino-U.S. trade talks suggest that the CCP is still misreading America’s China policy revolution.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Chinese officials had divided U.S. trade demands into three buckets, namely, China purchasing additional U.S. goods (30-40 percent); market openings and greater foreign investment in China (30-40 percent); and U.S. demands for China to change its industrial policy (20-40 percent). The PRC believes that the first bucket of demands can be met immediately, while demands in the second bucket would take years to negotiate. The PRC refuses to negotiate most of the demands in the third bucket “because of national security or political reasons.”

The WSJ wrote: “U.S. officials said they believed this accounting underscored that the Chinese didn’t understand U.S. priorities, especially when it came to protecting intellectual property.”

If the CCP had realized the full implications of America’s tough stance on China (recent media reports suggest that the CCP is gradually dawning on the fact), the Chinese officials might not have proposed the three buckets. Instead, the CCP seems to be hoping that the U.S. midterm elections in November and the special counsel investigations could create favorable conditions for the PRC to renegotiate trade with America. As we laid out in an earlier article, America’s policy shift on China should stay regardless of a “blue wave” or “red wave” in November.

What’s next:
Barring unforeseen circumstances, neither the U.S. nor the PRC is likely to blink on North Korea or the trade dispute.

China’s economy is worsening, and the CCP cannot withstand a trade war with America. However, the CCP would still very likely mobilize its propaganda assets to swing the narrative of the trade dispute in its favor. National Security Advisor John Bolton said in an interview with ABC on Aug. 19 that the U.S. government is concerned about election inference from four countries, including China.

The Trump administration must utilize creative strategies and tactics to counter CCP propaganda and come out ahead on trade and North Korea.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University