Geopolitics Watch: Early Analysis of the Sino-US ‘Mini-deal’

◎ The Trump administration is complementing the CCP’s delaying tactics with a “phase-by-phase” approach to a trade deal, and is falling into the CCP’s trap.


Between Oct. 1 and Oct. 11, senior Chinese and American officials held the thirteenth round of Sino-U.S. trade talks in Washington D.C. On the second day, United States President Donald Trump met with Chinese vice premier Liu He at the Oval Office and announced that they had “come to a very substantial phase one deal.”

The phase one deal includes:

  • China agrees to purchase American farm products totaling $40 billion to $50 billion. U.S. finance secretary Steven Mnuchin said that the $40 billion to $50 billion in farm purchases will be an annual figure over two years.
  • The U.S. would not be going ahead with a planned increase in tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods from 25 percent to 30 percent on Oct. 15.
  • Trump said: “Currency foreign exchange will be covered in entirety. Financial services, I think, will be covered pretty much in its entirety. So the banks and lending institutions — all institutions — are covered.”
  • Some unspecified technology transfer agreements.
  • U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said that Huawei is not part of the phase one agreement.
  • U.S. officials told The Wall Street Journal that both sides “made progress on intellectual-property protection and rules to prevent currency manipulation.”

Trump said that the paperwork of the deal should be “done over the next four weeks,” and added that a formal signing with him and Xi Jinping could take place at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meetings in Chile in five weeks time.

Trump also said that technology transfer will largely be done in phase two of the trade deal, and “you’ll either have two phases or three phases.”

Trump said, “I think that world peace — you know, there was a lot of friction between the United States and China. And now, it’s a lovefest. That’s a good thing. But that’s good for China and it’s good for us, but it’s good for the world.”

When asked by reporters about Hong Kong and the trade talks, Trump said that the subject was discussed and noted that “great progress has been made by China in Hong Kong.” Trump said, “I actually told the Vice Premier it really has toned down a lot from the initial days of a number of months ago, when I saw a lot of people … We were discussing it, and I think that’s going to take care of itself. I actually think this deal is a great deal for the people of Hong Kong to see what happened. I think this is a very positive thing for Hong Kong … [the protests] really has deescalated a lot from the beginning, and we were discussing that.”

In a short Q&A with the press on his way to board a helicopter, President Trump appeared to be asked if China was going to keep their word, to which he replied in the affirmative and said, “they want to make a deal, they’re going to keep their word.”

The big picture
The latest round of Sino-U.S. trade talks comes amid the backdrop of sharpening rhetoric by senior Trump administration officials over the Chinese Communist Party’s persecution of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang (Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the “pages of George Orwell’s 1984 are coming to life there”); a raft of legislation and gestures by the U.S. Congress in support of Taiwan and Hong Kong; escalation of violence and the enactment of a colonial-era emergency law in Hong Kong; and growing alarm over the CCP censorship of American companies at the grassroots level.

Our take:
1. From the so-called Sino-U.S. “mini-deal” to Trump essentially repeating CCP talking points (“what’s good for China is good for us and good for the world” sounds suspiciously like the CCP’s “win-win consensus” propaganda rhetoric) in his meeting with Liu He and tacitly approving the CCP’s handling of Hong Kong (we looked at the CCP’s strategies here, here, and here), it appears that the CCP has stolen a march on America in the Sino-U.S. “Battle of Waterloo.” Currently, developments are progressing per the CCP’s ideal scenario that we identified in our Special Report, and the U.S. has even fewer windows of opportunity left open to swing the Battle’s momentum in its favor.

2. By adopting a phase-by-phase approach in pursuing an “epic” or “monumental” trade deal with China, the Trump administration is complementing the CCP’s delaying tactics and is falling into its trap.

3. It is unclear why Trump would believe that the Chinese regime wants “to make a deal” and that “they’re going to keep their word” this time. The CCP lives by “deception, perniciousness, and struggle” (假 惡 鬥), actively engages in “unrestricted warfare” with the U.S., and has a long track record of going back on its word. As former FBI agent W. Cleon Skousen wrote in The Naked Communist, “with Homo-Marxian the signing of fifty-three treaties and subsequent violation of fifty-one of them is not hypocrisy but strategy.”

4. Trump’s remarks on Hong Kong suggest that the CCP’s “advancing to retreat” strategy has been highly successful. The CCP could feel emboldened by Trump’s remarks and subsequently ramp up suppression in Hong Kong and bring about the “normalization” of the city.

5. The “very substantial phase one deal” will benefit Xi Jinping’s situation ahead of the delayed Fourth Plenum meeting.

Get smart
It should be noted that the “very substantial phase one deal” has not yet been inked and that there are still some weeks to go until Trump and Xi meet in Chile to put pen to paper. Put another way, the situation could easily change at the drop of a hat.

To minimize uncertainty, avoid risks, and seize opportunities, businesses, investors, and governments must look beyond the cut and thrust of Sino-U.S. trade negotiations and instead account for broader geopolitical trends and the severe political crisis (see here and here) in the CCP brought about by a “you die, I live” factional struggle.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University
“Since the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition movement, I have periodically engaged with articles from SinoInsider. SinoInsider’s insights have deepened my understanding of the Chinese Communist Party’s regime. These resources have been invaluable in navigating the opaque world of Chinese elite politics, significantly enhancing my commentary on my Hong Kong online radio program, HK Peanut.”
Andrew To Kwan-hang, former chairman of the League of Social Democrats and founder of HK Peanut