Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Politics Watch: Politburo Meeting and Study Session Reveal Regime Crisis

◎ Xi is likely seeking to stamp his paramount authority and unify the Party as political, economic, and social crises mount in China.


On Jan. 25, Xi Jinping chaired a meeting of the Chinese Communist Party’s Politburo and reviewed work reports from the Central Secretariat and the Party committees of the State Council, the National People’s Congress, the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, the Supreme People’s Court, and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate.

According to Xinhua’s report of the meeting, Xi “fully confirmed” the work in 2018 done by the six organs, and approved their plans for 2019.

The Politburo meeting also reviewed the CCP Central Committee’s opinions on strengthening the CCP’s political work and two regulations, namely, the reporting of major issues and the selection of Party and government officials.

On the morning of the same day, the Politburo held its 12th collective study session on “media development” in the new headquarters of the People’s Daily in Beijing. In reporting on the study session, Xinhua ran the headline “Xi Jinping: Promoting the Deepening of Integrated Media Development to Consolidate the Common Theoretical Foundation for All Party members and All People.” People’s Daily ran a commentary on the study session titled “Promoting the Deepening of Integrated Media and Amplify Mainstream Public Communications.”

The backdrop:
The Jan. 25 Politburo meeting and study session come after the release of poor economic data for 2018 and the announcement of stimulus measures by the People’s Bank of China.

The meeting and study session were also held a day after the conclusion of a four-day study session for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials. The topic of the study session was “persevering with the bottom line in mind to guard against major risk.” We previously analyzed that the study session for senior officials is a signal that the CCP regime is facing “an immense, and likely unprecedented, political crisis.”

Meanwhile in Venezuela, Juan Guaidó, the Venezuelan opposition leader and National Assembly head, declared himself interim president on Jan. 23. Over 100,000 Venezuelans took to the streets to oppose the Maduro dictatorship, and the pro-government military forces appeared to stand aside instead of suppressing the uprising. America, Canada, many countries in Latin America, and other countries worldwide publicly supported Guaidó’s move and recognized him as interim president. However, China, Russia, and Turkey continue to recognize the Maduro government.

Our take:
1. Like the early study session for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials, the recent Politburo meeting and study session signal crisis in the Chinese regime.

2. Xi Jinping is likely finding an opportunity to strengthen his authority in the regime with the Politburo meeting and study session.

Based on our analysis of CCP elite politics and the factional struggle, Party leaders tend to establish paramount authority by emphasizing a crisis for the regime (real or imagined) and a need for a political strongman to steady the ship. With increased authority, Party leaders can move to suppress internal opposition and unite the Party in the name of resolving the crisis. In Xi Jinping’s case, he appears to be seeking to steer the regime away from the unsustainable economic policies and debilitating institutional corruption of Jiang Zemin’s era of dominance (1997 to 2012) and sidestep Jiang faction control via the collective leadership system. The anti-corruption campaign, military modernization effort, and grandiose expansionist policies of recent years are part of Xi’s attempt to break up entrenched interests in the regime, consolidate power, and establish paramount authority so that he can pursue reform-minded policies (see here for a discussion of what we mean by Xi’s reforms). The manner in which Politburo meetings and study sessions are carried out offer clues about the security of Xi’s position.

The Party committees of the five major regime organs (State Council, NPC, CPPCC, SPC, SPP) began delivering work reports to Xi Jinping at the Politburo meeting in January 2015. In 2015, Xi announced military reforms and moved to consolidate his control over the People’s Liberation Army. In January 2016, the Central Secretariat and five major regime organs started the practice of delivering work reports to Xi during a Politburo meeting. Because Politburo Standing Committee members like Li Keqiang (State Council premier), Li Zhanshu (NPC chief), and Wang Yang (CPPCC chief) have to personally present the work report of the organ which they head to Xi, the practice symbolically emphasizes Xi’s position as the Party’s “core” leader.

While Xi consolidated power to a high degree at the 19th Party Congress, his authority was weakened when U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods went into effect in July 2018. The imposing of U.S. tariffs indicated that Xi’s trade policy had failed to avert economic trouble for the regime, and left him open to attacks from political rivals. We wrote about the “soft coups” and political crisis facing the Xi leadership last year (see here, here, and here).

Hence, the recent high-level meetings and study sessions in the CCP are very likely Xi’s attempt to reassert his paramount authority and unify the Party as political, economic, and social crises mount in China.

3. In parsing state and Party media reports on the Politburo study session on “media development,” it appears that the CCP is aware that it has lost control of the propaganda narrative and is losing popular support.

We previously analyzed that the CCP had misread the U.S. and how its propaganda failed to cover up its missteps in trade negotiations with Washington. State and Party media reporting on the Sino-U.S. trade war has since become a subject of mockery on the Chinese internet and society.

The CCP has always been proud of its “gun” (PLA) and “pen” (propaganda), the “magic weapons” of the Party. However, the Party is calling on its “pen” to “amplify mainstream public communications,” which suggests that the CCP believes that the propaganda apparatus has not done enough “amplification,” is not “mainstream” enough, and most definitely has not become the “common theoretical foundation for all Party members and all people.”

Mishandling of trade war propaganda work aside, we believe that the CCP is putting an emphasis on “media development” to counter the flourishing of “self-media” (the equivalent of Youtube commentators who talk about current affairs) and the popularity of “breaching the Great Firewall” (“翻牆”) by Chinese netizens.

3. Speaking at the opening ceremony of the study session for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials, Xi Jinping said that the regime should be on “high alert” for Black Swan and Gray Rhino events.

The CCP will likely interpret recent political developments in Venezuela as a Black Swan event, and could increase the Party’s sense of crisis and fear of similar political Black Swans occurring in China.

Get smart:
We wrote in our China 2019 outlook that the country “could see political Black Swans and charging Gray Rhinos in the economic and social arena.”

To get a handle on political developments in China, sign up for a SinoInsider membership or preorder our 2019 special report.

"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University
Previous
Next