Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Social Watch: In China, the CCP is Losing Control Over the Trade War Narrative

◎ The Sino-U.S. trade war is proving to be a quagmire for the CCP propaganda apparatus.

Much reporting on China’s response to the Sino-U.S. trade dispute is focused on official statements and remarks from senior officials or scholars. Readers of those responses can be forgiven for believing that China as a whole steadfastly opposes trade action by the United States.

The sentiment on the ground in China on the trade conflict is the opposite of official rhetoric. Chinese netizens have been mercilessly mocking the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) propaganda ever since Party and state media started attacking the U.S. for planning to levy tariffs on Chinese goods in late March. Online chatter points out logical loopholes in CCP propaganda (“why is China only buying more from U.S. products for ‘the benefit of the people’ under American pressure, and not in the many years before?”). Netizens also poke fun at the CCP when it struggles to smooth out or reverse earlier propaganda that has become redundant or self-defeating with new and hard-to-predict developments in the trade conflict. Using allusions and backhanded logic (almost certainly to evade censors), Chinese netizens are even encouraging the U.S. to escalate the trade war to defeat the CCP. During the three rounds of Sino-U.S. trade talks, Chinese netizens expressed great skepticism over the CCP’s “win-win victory” rhetoric, and believed that China was the losing party in the negotiations (see our article).

After several rounds of shooting itself in the foot, the CCP shifted its rhetoric on the trade war to cope with the U.S. tariffs announced in mid-June (see our article). Several news outlets reported instructions from Beijing to the propaganda apparatus to refrain from criticizing U.S. President Donald Trump (but instead blame the U.S. government) and to soften commentary on American trade action. In July, the People’s Daily ran a three-part commentary series to criticize “pompous, arrogant writing” that it claimed inspired inflated sentiments in the population about China’s actual economic abilities.

Despite the change in propaganda strategy, the CCP continues to lose control over the narrative. Two recent examples are revealing of this phenomenon.

On July 10, state mouthpiece Xinhua published a commentary titled, “In Fighting the Trade War, China Has the Ability to Pay Part of the Price.” The article described the trade war as a “battle for the nation’s fate”; claimed that the Chinese people “deeply understand” that “the nation comes before family”; and asked the people to “endure the difficult period with a responsible government.” Chinese netizens pointed out that the trade war actually threatened the CCP’s fate more than China’s, and that “the country comes before family” idea was a perversion of Confucian teachings that ranked the family before the nation. Netizens also scoffed at the idea that the CCP was a “responsible government,” pointing out that the Chinese people have difficulties in affording healthcare and registering for schools, among a list of other problems. They also requested that Chinese officials should make public their assets, an oblique reference to severe corruption in the official ranks. As the criticisms mounted, Xinhua later retracted the commentary.

On July 12, China’s Ministry of Commerce published a statement criticizing the U.S. Trade Representative’s (USTR) Section 301 trade action on July 10. In six points and about 1,800 characters, the Commerce Ministry accused the U.S. of “distorting facts” and having “no international legal basis” for levying $200 billion worth of tariffs on Chinese products while portraying China as the victim of U.S. trade policies. Xiakedao, a commentary arm under Party mouthpiece People’s Daily, wrote a piece on the Commerce Ministry’s statement and published it on various portals like WeChat and Sohu. According to, a website that tracks and collects WeChat posts, the Xiakedao article on WeChat saw a “train wreck” of a situation when it was flooded with negative comments after it was posted 11 p.m. on July 12, or after the “Internet Water Army” (Chinese internet astroturfers) were not at work to “water down” the negative sentiment. Many of the negative comments noted that it was ridiculous for the CCP to rebut the USTR’s detailed 200-page report on China’s trade transgressions with a 1,800 character statement, with the implication being that the CCP did not bother to properly address the USTR’s findings before condemning it and the U.S. tariffs. At the time of writing, the WeChat comments under the Xiakedao article cannot be accessed. The over 1,000 comments under the Sohu version are mainly positive, but come from only 148 accounts. The Sohu version has been viewed 3.05 million times.

Xiakedao article on the Ministry of Commerce statement on the U.S. Trade Representative’s Section 301 action. (Screen capture/

Why it matters:
Since Deng Xiaoping was in office, the CCP has come to rely on the gun (the military), the pen (propaganda), and the purse (economic prosperity) to maintain its political legitimacy and social order. With rule by martial law virtually out of the question and an economy that is fast worsening, the CCP only has propaganda left to buttress its authority and prevent regime-destabilizing social chaos. Political risks heighten greatly for the CCP when its propaganda apparatus can no longer control the narrative on the mainland.

Our take:
1. The Sino-U.S. trade war is proving to be a quagmire for the CCP propaganda apparatus, at least on the domestic front. The CCP loses face and sinks into the mess of its own creation if it says little or nothing, and sinks faster when it resorts to the standard “nation-building” rhetoric or goes on the attack. In other words, the CCP’s inability to cope with the trade war has caused it to lose control of the narrative at home, and as a result, control over society. Observers of the trade war who do not track the sentiment on the Chinese internet are missing a significant portion of the picture.

The CCP’s trade propaganda, however, seems to still have a certain effect beyond China’s shores. Official CCP response to the trade war is clearly aimed at depicting China and the Chinese economy as being robust enough to cope with a trade war. The Chinese regime’s statistics bureau has even published inaccurate economic data several times this year to bolster the impression that the Chinese economy is handling U.S. trade pressure well (see here and here). Yet Western and international media have been taking official Chinese data, statements, and remarks by officials at face value, and do not qualify that the data or comments are propaganda tactics, and hence are part of the CCP’s overall propaganda and disinformation effort. Indeed, the CCP might be in more serious trouble at this stage if the world realizes that the CCP has been bluffing about China’s economic abilities and capacity to withstand a trade war all along.

2. Social tensions in China would rise when CCP propaganda becomes more ineffective and the Chinese economy worsens, and the CCP and its leadership would face increased political risks. Foreign businesses in the mainland should pay close attention to the social situation to better gauge political risk in China when making plans.

3. The Sino-U.S. trade war has trapped the CCP propaganda apparatus between a rock and a hard place, a rare situation. If the U.S. government takes the opportunity to implement targeted counter propaganda and disinformation strategies, the CCP will find it hard to maintain its Potemkin village. And when CCP propaganda collapses, people in China and elsewhere would discover that the Chinese regime is a “plump-looking cancer patient.”

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University