Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Politics Watch: Xi’s Meeting with Provincial-level Officials Hints at Unprecedented Crisis in the CCP

◎ The CCP regime is facing an immense, and likely unprecedented, political crisis.

On Jan. 21, all seven Chinese Communist Party Politburo Standing Committee members, as well as senior provincial and ministerial-level officials, attended the opening ceremony of a study session at the Central Party School of the CCP. The topic of the study session was “persevering with the bottom line in mind to guard against major risk.”

Xi Jinping gave a speech at the opening ceremony of the study session. Key points of the speech include:

1. Xi “analyzed and raised specific requirements on the prevention and defusing of major risks in areas including politics, ideology, economy, science and technology, society, the external environment and Party building.”

2. Xi “urged Party committees and governments at all levels to pursue a holistic approach to national security and follow the requirements of the Central Committee” to ensure the political security of the regime.

3. The international situation is “turbulent” and the “surrounding environment is complex and sensitive.”

4. The Chinese regime must be continually on “high alert,” and must guard against “Black Swan” and “Gray Rhino” events.

5. Priority should be given to “strengthening the ideological and political education among the young.”

6. The Chinese regime needs to strengthen “hardship awareness, forward planning, and accurate judgments” to “respond properly” to the “major risks that may arise in the economic field.”

7. The safety of science and technology must be strengthened.

8. “Stability maintenance” must be carried out vigorously, and popular grievances must be resolved.

9. The campaign to “sweep black and fight evil” (anti-Mafia campaign) must be advanced. The “protective umbrellas” of “evil forces” must be targeted.

10. The Chinese regime must “persist and develop” the “fengqiao experience.” (The “fengqiao experience” is a CCP tactic to pit the masses against each other for the purposes of “stability maintenance.”)

11. The safety of “major overseas projects and personnel” must be ensured.

12. Improvements must be made in the development of the Belt and Road Initiative.

13. Anti-corruption work and “strictly governing the Party” must continue, and the Party must be purged of “hidden dangers.” Party cadres must be in sync with the Central Committee to a high degree on matters of ideological and political actions.

The CCP clearly attached great importance to this particular study session of provincial and ministerial-level officials. First, all members of the Politburo Standing Committee were in attendance; vice president Wang Qishan only missed the session because he was attending the World Economic Forum at Davos. Second, state media gave prominent coverage to the study session: Xinhua ran a report of the session as its lead article and published a commentary on it. CCTV’s “Xinwen Lianbo” led off with a report on the study session that ran for nearly 15 minutes.

The study session appears to have been scheduled around the period of the Politburo’s “democratic life meeting” on Dec. 26, 2018.

Our take:
1. For Xi Jinping to hold a study session for provincial and ministerial-level officials at this juncture and say what he said at the opening ceremony are signs that the CCP regime is facing an immense, and likely unprecedented, political crisis. This political crisis is more severe than a scenario where the CCP only delayed the holding of a Fourth Plenum.

According to precedent, the coming CCP plenary session is supposed to be an all-hands meeting of the Central Committee (204 members) and alternate members (175 members) to discuss economic issues, including crafting a five-year plan.

The Jan. 21-commenced study session, however, is a gathering of all senior officials at the provincial and ministerial level (including NPC, CPPCC, CCDI officials), not just the Central Committee and its alternate members.

In our Dec. 17, 2018 analysis on Xi’s reform anniversary speech and political crisis in China, we noted that “if no Fourth Plenum is held, this means that the factional struggle is extremely intense and Xi is in grave danger.”

2. Aside from the key points listed in the above section, an important clue that both Xi and the CCP regime are facing an immense crisis can be found in the topic of the study session, “persevering with the bottom line in mind to guard against major risk.”

The so-called “bottom line” is a reference to the CCP’s ability to stay in power. In other words, senior regime officials are being informed that they need to help the regime survive several existential problems.

3. Two pressing existential problems which the regime is facing is the Huawei issue and the Sino-U.S. trade war.

Presently, the United States and its allies have either ceased or are in the process of curbing the use and purchase of Huawei products. Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s CFO, is in Canada awaiting extradition to the U.S. on charges of fraud and violating international sanctions against Iran. Should the U.S. hit Huawei with a business ban and prohibit the sale of American microchips and other high-tech components to the CCP’s “national champion,” then Huawei faces a real risk of bankruptcy. A crippled Huawei endangers the CCP’s high-tech ambitions and propaganda, the Belt and Road project, the regime’s plan for global 5G dominance, and military communications.

Meanwhile, China’s economy is in danger if the Chinese regime cannot reach a trade agreement with the U.S. on March 1. The threat of additional tariffs and increased tariff rates could lead to the bursting of China’s property bubble, which would trigger a debt and financial crisis. Financial and economic woes will in turn sharpen social tensions, and the discontented masses could directly endanger the regime.

4. The practice of holding study sessions for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials began in 1999. Historically, such study sessions are held in February each year (with the exception of 2001 and 2009).

However, there have been irregularities in the holding of study sessions in the past six years, a phenomenon which we believe can be attributed to the fierce factional fighting that occurred before and after Xi Jinping took office in 2012.

No study session for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials was held in February 2012. That month saw the Wang Lijun incident and the exposing of Bo Xilai and Zhou Yongkang’s coup plot. In March, the 17th Central Committee suddenly summoned 3,300 provincial, city, and county-level political and legal affairs Party secretaries to Beijing over several rounds for special “training.”

From November 2013 to the first half of 2014, the 18th Central Committee held study sessions for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials at the Central Party School. The officials were made to read Xi Jinping’s speeches, and had to bunk in dormitories (one bed, one bookcase, and two tables per dorm room) and dine at a canteen; no banquets were allowed. Lessons were held during the day, and the officials carried out “self-study” at night. The only time that officials had interactions with each other was on the way to lessons or during meal breaks at the canteen.

Zhou Yongkang (Dec. 1, 2013) and Xu Caihou (March 2014) were arrested when the 2013-2014 study session was ongoing. The Central Committee briefed study session attendees about the Zhou case.

On Feb. 2, 2015, Xi Jinping said in a speech to senior provincial and ministerial-level officials who were attending a study session that “no one is allowed to violate the governing policies of the central authorities by running ‘independent kingdoms’ and doing as they please. No one is allowed to take matters into their own hands or bend the law for selfish gains…” The following month, former Central Military Commission vice chair Guo Boxiong was investigated.

On Jan. 8, 2016, Xi spoke at a study session for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials. He brought up the Cultural Revolution on two occasions in the speech, and described that era as a “calamitous decade.” Although 2016 was the 50th year anniversary of the Cultural Revolution, Xi did not commemorate the political campaign, and state media published articles criticizing the Cultural Revolution.

From July 26 to July 27, 2017, senior provincial and ministerial-level officials gathered in Beijing for an irregular study session. The session was held at the military-run Jingxi Hotel in Beijing instead of the Central Party School. Official footage showed that the no pens or paper were on the table when officials listened to a speech by Xi, which suggests that they were not allowed to make any recordings. That month, former Politburo member and Chongqing Party boss Sun Zhengcai was arrested. At the end of August, former CMC members Fang Fenghui and Zhang Yang were investigated.

Based on the incidents above, it seems fair to say that study sessions for senior provincial and ministerial-level officials during the Xi era are held when the regime is facing serious problems, particularly those of a political nature.

5. Xi said that the regime should be on “high alert” for Black Swans and Gray Rhinos in his speech at the opening ceremony of the 2019 study session.

We wrote in our China 2019 outlook: “China could see political Black Swans and charging Gray Rhinos in the economic and social arena. The CCP regime will likely face immense challenges from inside China and abroad.”

6. We believe that Xi Jinping is signaling to senior officials that the regime is facing immense crisis to pave the way for him to make major concessions to the U.S. to secure a trade agreement on March 1. Xi can only meet the Trump administration’s demands if he can sell to officials the notion that the regime is in an existential crisis and that he has no choice but to reach a compromise with America.

What’s next:
1. Vice premier Liu He may be able to offer major concessions that will satisfy U.S. conditions when he travels to Washington at the end of January. There is a possibility that the CCP could accept an arrangement where the U.S. is allowed to regularly monitor and review the regime’s progress in implementing the trade agreement and reforms.

2. Xi could purge “big tigers” to bolster his personal authority and intimidate the officialdom to ensure that they comply with his reform policies. We believe that Zhou Qiang, the Supreme People’s Court chief justice, is very possibly a purge target.

3. The political and legal affairs system could see frequent personnel reshuffles and arrests this year with the drive to weed out so-called “protective umbrellas.”

4. By suppressing the PLAC system, Xi could resolve popular grievances and boost support for his leadership; confiscate the ill-gotten gains of corrupt officials to replenish state coffers; and forestall a situation where officials in the PLAC system use “stability maintenance” policy to undermine the central authorities.

5. The CCP will continue to strengthen its control over society, including policing speech and religious groups. The human rights situation in China could take a turn for the worse.

Get smart:
2019 will be an especially crucial year for the CCP and the Sino-U.S. relationship. Understand what’s at stake with our special report, “2019: A Waterloo Year for China and the United States.”

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University