Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: Early Analysis of China’s Government Work Report

◎ Several proposals in the 2019 government work report seemingly cancel out each other or will contradict Xi’s push to have the “Party lead everything”


Chinese premier Li Keqiang delivered his 2019 government work report to the National People’s Congress at the Two Sessions on March 5.

The backdrop:
The government work report comes as China is experiencing an economic downturn and waging a trade war with the United States. Meanwhile, the factional struggle in the Chinese Communist Party appears to be escalating.

Our take:
Li’s work report offers specific economic targets which Beijing hopes to accomplish in 2019, but is vague on foreign policy issues. Three early takeaways:

1. Beijing wants to have its cake and eat it

Several proposals in the 2019 government work report seemingly cancel out each other or will contradict Xi Jinping’s push to have the “Party lead everything”:

  • The report calls for a continuation of “structural deleveraging,” yet hints at government efforts to increase liquidity with a “prudent and moderated monetary policy” and “proactive fiscal policy”;
  • The report unveils planned cuts of about 2 trillion yuan ($298.3 billion) in taxes and fees for firms, as well as a simplification of administrative procedures for firms, yet contains plans to boost environmental protection, poverty alleviation, and elderly care;
  • The report said that China will “further relax controls over market access, shorten the negative list for foreign investment, and permit wholly foreign funded enterprises to operate in more sectors,” yet does not provide details or explain how further relaxation of controls in China stacks with increased Party control over all aspects on the mainland;
  • The report said that Beijing will make targeted cuts in the reserve requirement ratio for small and medium-sized banks to increase lending to small enterprises by large banks by over 30 percent, a move which may raise risks and contradict Beijing’s “battle against potential financial risks in 2019”;
  • The report calls on local governments to “lead frugal days” and “find ways to raise funding” without offering any solutions.

2. Beijing is not optimistic about China’s economy

The government work report hints that Beijing is expecting China’s economy to worsen further in 2019:

  • Beijing is targeting economic growth of 6.0 to 6.5 percent in 2019;
  • China’s budget deficit target for 2019 is 2.8 percent, up 0.2 percent from the previous year;
  • Beijing plans to keep increases in M2 money supply in line with nominal GDP growth “to keep major indicators within an appropriate range”;
  • China’s finance ministry will issue 2.15 trillion yuan worth of special government bonds in 2019, the bulk of which will be for infrastructure investment;
  • Beijing plans to add 11 million urban jobs and achieve a surveyed urban unemployment rate of about 5.5 percent.

Beijing’s 2019 economic policies appear to focus on stabilizing unemployment, the financial sector, foreign trade, foreign investment, domestic investment, and market expectations. Of the six focuses, greater emphasis is being placed on the financial sector, investments, and unemployment.

For the CCP to “compromise” on its previous policies through tax cuts, cutting expenditure, and curbing control affirm our pessimistic view of China’s economic prospects. The fact that “compromises” were made also suggests that China’s economic woes are affecting the Party’s ruling legitimacy.

3. Beijing is vague on foreign policy

Li Keqiang’s report deals with the Sino-U.S. trade war and other foreign trade issues in the broadest of terms:

  • The report notes that “economic globalization has suffered setbacks, multilateralism has taken a hit, and there is fluctuation in the international financial markets.” In particular, “Sino-U.S. economic and trade frictions have adversely affected the production of some companies and market expectations.”
  • The report calls for an acceleration in the construction of a “free-trade zone network of the highest standards, promote regional comprehensive economic partnership agreements such as the China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Area and China-EU investment negotiations, as well as continue to promote Sino-U.S. economic and trade consultations”;
  • The report drops the “Made in China 2025” slogan but continues to emphasize Beijing’s plan to upgrade China’s manufacturing industry and strengthen technology development.

The government work report’s “omission” of the “Made in China 2025” tag and vague foreign policy targets suggest that Beijing is trying to keep things low-key for the moment and avoid making announcements that look like concessions to the United States before a Sino-U.S. trade agreement is reached. Beijing may find other channels to expand on foreign policy plans after or during the Two Sessions; top banking regulator Guo Shuqing told reporters on the sidelines of the Two Sessions that China can “absolutely” reach a deal with America on opening up its financial sector.

4. We got it right—Our China 2019 outlook

The government work report said that Beijing plans to cut taxes and boost infrastructure spending.

We predicted Beijing’s moves in our China 2019 outlook:

  • “The central government will introduce tax reduction measures, but will unlikely trim a proportionate number of government workers. As a result, corporate tax will be subtly raised, not decreased”;
  • “The central government may order more infrastructure projects, but will find it tough selling bonds to fund the projects.”

Get smart:
1. Li Keqiang’s government work report indicates that the CCP seems to now have a better handle on the trade war than last year. The trade war “ceasefire” has also granted Beijing a chance to “catch its breath” and develop countermeasures, including using delay tactics to gain an advantage over Washington. We identified the CCP’s delay measures and its strategic significance in our 2019 special report.

2. The Xi leadership cannot possibly have its cake and eat it. Chinese officials will prioritize the preservation and accumulation of political capital to secure career advancement, and will be torn between implementing targets in the government work report and staying “politically correct” under Xi’s “the Party rules everything” policy. A form of bureaucratic gridlock could ensure, and Chinese companies could end up with heavier burdens this year.

Bureaucratic gridlock could also sabotage a Sino-U.S. trade deal if one is reached in March. In our China 2019 outlook, we wrote that the Trump administration could yet raise tariff rates and add tariffs in the second half of the year.

3. Foreign companies or investors should stay skeptical about signs of China’s economic and financial “recovery” (such as A-shares entering “bull market territory”), and be prepared for further deterioration of the Chinese economy in the third and fourth quarters of the year.


Warning: Undefined array key "disable_title_link" in /home/sinoinsi/public_html/wp-content/plugins/archives-calendar-widget/arw-widget.php on line 82

Warning: Undefined array key "different_theme" in /home/sinoinsi/public_html/wp-content/plugins/archives-calendar-widget/arw-widget.php on line 83

Warning: Undefined array key "categories" in /home/sinoinsi/public_html/wp-content/plugins/archives-calendar-widget/arw-widget.php on line 85
Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University
“Since the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition movement, I have periodically engaged with articles from SinoInsider. SinoInsider’s insights have deepened my understanding of the Chinese Communist Party’s regime. These resources have been invaluable in navigating the opaque world of Chinese elite politics, significantly enhancing my commentary on my Hong Kong online radio program, HK Peanut.”
Andrew To Kwan-hang, former chairman of the League of Social Democrats and founder of HK Peanut
Previous
Next