Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: Why China Wants Foreign-listed Tech Companies in the A-share Market

◎ China wants tech giants and “unicorns” to list in domestic markets to prevent a liquidity crunch that could trigger a debt crisis.

On March 30, China’s State Council approved guidelines to allow private tech companies to list on the domestic market.

Through the Chinese Depositary Receipts (CDR) mechanism, Chinese tech giants and “unicorns” (unlisted private companies worth $1 billion and are not more than 10 years old) can float shares or launch initial public offerings on the A-share market.

According to the guidelines, CDRs apply to companies in sectors that possess critical technology that complies with China’s national strategy policies, including internet and software, big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, semiconductors, biotech, high-end manufacturing, and others. These innovative companies should also have valuations of at least 20 billion yuan (about $3.2 billion) and annual revenue of not less than 3 billion yuan.

The guidelines also touched on the issue of optimizing the issuance of securities, as well as the variable interest entities of innovative companies and other company governance issues.

The CDR plan appeared to have been approved at warp speed, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission floating the idea in early March and the State Council passing the guidelines on March 22.

Presently, there are six Chinese companies listed in America or Hong Kong that qualify for CDRs: Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu,, NetEase, and China Mobile.

The big picture:
1. The Trump administration’s tax cuts are attracting capital and industries to the United States and having an impact on the Chinese economy. Also, Trump is planning to impose $50 to $60 billion of tariffs on Chinese imports.

2. The Xi Jinping administration is in the midst of a de-risking and deleveraging campaign. Chinese regulators are supervising and investigating financial institutions with unprecedented strictness, and efforts are being made to reduce debt.

3. A May 1 value-added tax rate reform on the manufacturing, transportation, construction, telecommunication and agricultural sectors will result in annual savings of 400 billion yuan (about $63.5 billion).

Our take:
1. China wants tech giants and “unicorns” to list in domestic markets to prevent a liquidity crunch that could trigger a debt crisis. In our article analyzing the merger of the banking and insurance regulators, we noted that China’s banking and insurance sector needs to undergo deleveraging and reduce its asset-liability ratio to prevent financial risks from blowing up. And in the current liquidity squeeze, the securities regulator needs to arrange for top companies to list shares domestically and jumpstart the markets.

2. China has to ensure that its innovative companies can operate normally to maintain confidence in its markets. If the companies cannot continue normal operations, then China will be in trouble in an unfriendly business climate.

Unlike the U.S., China’s tax cuts are not attractive enough for businesses to consider staying in the country, and can only be counted as a declaration of intent. In fact, China’s tax cuts would just add to its financial pressures.

3. Chinese unicorns need a ceaseless stream of funding to maintain growth. The earlier crackdown on internet financial companies has exposed severe debt risks in the sector. And once the markets grow cautious to venture capitalists, unicorns could meet with financing constraints.

4. We believe that Beijing is rushing the entry of unicorns and tech giants into the A-shares market to burnish its prestige and preserve confidence in the markets. Also, unicorns can cope with future liquidity contractions when the Chinese people buy CDRs of top tech companies.  

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University