Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Analyzing Biden’s Address to Congress and How the CCP Interprets It

◎ The following analysis was first published in the May 3, 2021 edition of our subscriber-only SinoWeekly Plus newsletter. Subscribe to SinoInsider to view past analyses in our newsletter archive.


On April 29, President Joe Biden laid out his domestic and foreign policy priorities in addressing a joint session of Congress

Biden’s roadmap for America broadly aligns with our earlier analysis of the Biden-Harris administration’s interim national security strategy and foreign policy guidance. We wrote at the time: 

  • Under the guise of “defending/revitalizing our democracy,” the Biden-Harris administration will “consolidate power at home, punish political enemies, and ram through pet projects like climate change actions and ‘equity’ programs.” 
  • “America on its current trajectory under the Biden-Harris administration will move towards authoritarianism and communism.”
  • The Biden-Harris administration’s approach to China is “anti-Xi, not anti-CCP.” 

Highlights of Biden’s speech that prove our points (with brief commentary) include: 

America
1. Biden said, “Tonight, I come to talk about crisis and opportunity. About rebuilding the nation, revitalizing our democracy, and winning the future for America … Now, after just 100 days, I can report to the nation, America is on the move again. Turning peril into possibility, crisis into opportunity, setbacks to strength.”

2. Biden continues to frame the Jan. 6 Capitol breach as an “insurrection” despite emerging evidence proving otherwise. For instance, Biden describes the incident as “the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War” in opening his speech. Later he talks about “a violent mob assaulting this Capitol—desecrating our democracy … The insurrection was an existential crisis, a test of whether our democracy could survive.”  

  • Commentary: On April 29, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brad Wiegmann said in a Congressional hearing that U.S. federal agents have arrested more than 430 people in connection with the Jan. 6 incident. “As the investigation continues, and as sufficient additional evidence is gathered and other criminal perpetrators are identified, we will continue to charge additional defendants with offenses relating to the events of January 6th,” he added. Wiegmann and President Biden’s remarks indicate that the Biden-Harris administration will keep expanding its persecution of political enemies as part of “defending/revitalizing our democracy” and power consolidation. 

3. Biden announced several plans to “deliver real equity,” including a new $1.8 trillion economic stimulus that “aims to redistribute trillions of dollars of resources from the highest-earning households and businesses to everyone making less than $400,000 a year,” according to a Wall Street Journal article

  • Commentary: Redistribution and “equity” have Marxist roots and are gateways to socialism and communism. Americans weaned on stimulus cheques, free public education where students are indoctrinated in neo-Marxist critical race theory and other socialist ideas, and other government handouts and social programs will be more inclined to support real socialism and communism over time. 

4. Biden said, “And we won’t ignore what our intelligence agents have determined to be the most lethal terrorist threat to our homeland today: White supremacy is terrorism.” 

  • Commentary: Many classical liberal, centrist, and conservative commentators have pointed out that the American left, mainstream media, Democrat politicians, and members of the establishment intelligentsia usually label people and things they disagree with as “White supremacists” as a form of demonization. Journalists on the political left have also warned of a “new domestic war on terror” aimed at combating “neo-Nazi, white supremacist ideology” and those who sympathize with people accused of being “White supremacists.” 

5. Biden said, “gun violence is becoming an epidemic in America … I will do everything in my power to protect the American people from this epidemic of gun violence … We need a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.”

  • Commentary: The Second Amendment allows the American people to protect themselves from tyrannical government. If the Biden-Harris administration is moving towards authoritarianism and communism, it will not stop at merely restricting Americans’ Second Amendment rights, but will work incrementally towards repealing them altogether. 

6. Biden said, “Our Constitution opens to the words, as trite as it sounds, ‘We the people.’ It’s time we remembered that ‘We the people’ are the government.” 

  • Commentary: Students of the Constitution will note that the Framers, fearing tyranny and wary of human fallibility, designed the Constitution to protect the people from the government. As James Madison wrote in Federalist 51, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” Biden’s reframing of the Constitution to equate the people and the government should be a warning sign to those who fear authoritarianism in America. 
  • Communist and socialist regimes frequently invoke “the people” to justify authoritarian rule by a handful of elites over the rest of the population. For instance, the CCP regime is called the People’s Republic of China, its military is called the People’s Liberation Army, and its courts and prosecuting bodies are called “People’s Courts” and “People’s Procuratorates.” The PRC government, however, ultimately serves the Party, not the people. 

China
1. Biden said, “We’re in competition with China and other countries to win the 21st century. We’re at a great inflection point in history. We have to do more than just build back better …

“… I would like to meet with those who have ideas that are different, that they think are better. I welcome those ideas. But the rest of the world is not waiting for us. I just want to be clear, from my perspective, doing nothing is not an option. Look, we can’t be so busy competing with one another that we forget the competition that we have with the rest of the world to win the 21st century.

“Secretary Blinken can tell you, I spent a lot of time with President Xi—traveled over 17,000 miles with him, spent over 24 hours in private discussions with him. When he called to congratulate, we had a two-hour discussion. He’s deadly earnest on becoming the most significant, consequential nation in the world. He and others, autocrats, think that democracy can’t compete in the 21st century with autocracies, because it takes too long to get consensus.”

  • Commentary: The Biden-Harris Interim National Security Strategic Guidance notes that “traditional distinctions between foreign and domestic policy … are less meaningful than ever before.” One of the ways in which we understand this blurring of foreign and domestic is that the Biden-Harris administration plans to use foreign issues and crises like China to advance its domestic agenda where applicable. From his remarks above, President Biden is calling on Republicans and those who disagree with him to “unite” and arrive at “consensus” to help him pass policies that supposedly aid the U.S. in “competition with China,” but will likely do more to allow the Biden-Harris administration to forge ahead with its radical socialist agenda than seriously address the CCP threat. Republicans who do not go along with the administration could be cast as “unpatriotic” and “uncooperative” in aiding America’s effort to “compete with China,” while dissidents could encounter political persecution. 
  • The “united front” approach of “working” with enemies in the name of combating an external enemy is a favorite tactic of Marxist radicals and was deployed to great effect by the CCP. During the Sino-Japanese War, the CCP exploited the Second United Front with the Kuomintang to infiltrate, subvert, and undermine the latter. Eventually, the “united front,” or “consensus,” laid the foundations for the KMT’s ouster from the mainland following the defeat of Imperial Japan. 
  • In an interview with Fox Business on April 30, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said of Biden’s speech, “Well if you listen to his rhetoric we’d be fine, but you and I both know this is likely to be an empty promise. There’s no evidence in the record that this administration is prepared to truly confront China.”

2. Biden said, “The investments I propose tonight also advance a foreign policy, in my view, that benefits the middle class. That means making sure that every nation plays by the same rules in the global economy, including China. In my discussions with President Xi, I told him we welcome the competition. We’re not looking for conflict.

“But I made absolutely clear that we’ll defend America’s interests across the board. America will stand up to unfair trade practices that undercut workers and American industries like subsidies from state to state-owned operations and enterprises and the theft of American technology and intellectual property. I also told President Xi that we’ll maintain a strong relationship in the Indo-Pacific, just as we do for NATO and Europe. Not to start a conflict, but to prevent one.

“I told him what I said to many world leaders, that America will not back away from our commitments, our commitments to human rights and our fundamental freedom and our alliances. I pointed out to him, no responsible American president could remain silent when basic human rights are being so blatantly violated. An American president has to represent the essence of what our country stands for.”

  • Commentary: Biden’s held Xi Jinping personally responsible for the CCP’s crimes and malign behavior spanning four decades using a rhetorical tactic. In other words, the Biden-Harris administration is essentially adhering to the “anti-Xi, not anti-CCP” China strategy that an establishment think-tank published shortly after his inauguration. 
  • Because the average person does not differentiate between China, the CCP, and Xi Jinping, most will presume that Biden is just being tough on China from his remarks. Indeed, most people will view Biden’s anecdote of “talking tough” to Xi as him being personally invested in taking on a dictator, unlike President Trump, whom mainstream media has depicted as being friendly with strongmen. 

OUR TAKE  
1. Biden’s speech to the joint session of Congress is terrible news for Xi Jinping but good news for the CCP. 

By now, the CCP would have deduced that the Biden-Harris administration does not plan to seriously address the threat of Communist China. The administration has made it abundantly clear that domestic issues (power consolidation) and climate change are its overriding priorities, and the “China challenge” is primarily used to help Washington advance its domestic agenda. Meanwhile, PRC scholar Di Dongsheng strongly alluded to successful CCP elite capture of the Biden-Harris administration (Joe Biden through his son Hunter) after the U.S. presidential elections in 2020. Thus, the CCP feels comfortable in stepping up its “wolf warrior” approach against the U.S. (see the Alaska meeting) and the world because it does not fear further and sudden escalation in the Sino-U.S. relationship, unlike during the Trump era. While the CCP appears to be consistent in its anti-American propaganda under Biden as compared to under Trump, glaring omissions (no Biden official has been villainized like how Secretary Pompeo was) and curious commentary (China Daily recently gave a backhanded compliment to Biden’s “young China officials”) show that it is now much less concerned with offending the U.S. than it is with intimidating America into kowtowing to the PRC. Beijing is also taking advantage of Washington’s lackluster China approach and focus on internal matters to promote its “East is declining, West is rising” propaganda and make inroads to become the global hegemon. 

The CCP is also much less concerned with the current iteration of ideological battle with America. The Biden-Harris administration’s “democracy versus autocracy” framing fails to pose any existential danger whatsoever to the regime; the CCP already sells itself as a “democracy” in its propaganda, while “autocracy” is not a criticism of communism. By contrast, the CCP fears the Trump administration’s ideological attack, namely, exposing it as a Marxist-Leninist organization, distinguishing between the Chinese people and the CCP, and publicly condemning Communist China on all human rights matters, including once-taboo topics like Falun Gong and forced organ harvesting. The CCP is aware that open criticisms of its human rights crimes is only a step away from sanctions and the world treating the PRC like the Nazi regime. Also, differentiating between the CCP and the Chinese people raises the possibility of a China without the Party in charge. Further, identifying the CCP as a Marxist-Leninist organization instead of, say, an “authoritarian capitalist” one, blows the “benign” cover that it has been using to interact and blend in with normal countries in the past 40 years; communist regimes are still viewed very negatively today given the atrocities they perpetrate and the horrors associated with their pernicious ideology. 

The CCP being less concerned about ideological struggle with the U.S., however, does not mean that it has ceased guarding against it. In an April 29 commentary published in Party mouthpiece People’s Daily, top PRC diplomat and Politburo member Yang Jiechi warned America, “if anyone challenges the Chinese Communist Party or China’s political system and leadership, the Chinese people will definitely not accept this.” 

On the flipside, President Biden’s address to Congress is bad for Xi Jinping. On paper, Washington is putting up the appearance of being tough on China, and Biden appears to be signaling that his displeasure with China is connected with Xi personally. What Xi wants is for the U.S. to revert U.S.-China relations to the pre-Trump “engagement” era. Xi’s rivals will undoubtedly seize upon Biden’s speech as yet another example of deteriorating Sino-U.S. relations to attack him at opportune moments. As we wrote previously, the Biden-Harris administration being “anti-Xi, not anti-CCP” keeps the pressure on Xi Jinping, “denying him the opportunity to claim credit for bringing about markedly improved Sino-U.S. relations by ‘delaying and waiting for change’ (以拖待变) in America, i.e. outlasting the Trump administration. Xi’s rivals can also wield America’s continued ‘tough on China’ approach as a cudgel against him.” It is also presently unclear whether Xi personally benefits from the CCP’s capture of U.S. ruling and business elite, and if so, to what degree; Wall Street and Washington elites would have more likely forged connections with Jiang faction elites in the past two decades than with the Xi camp given the factional dynamics during that period. 

2. Xi’s recent political messaging during his Guangxi tour indicates that he knows external circumstances are grim for himself and Communist China. The CCP’s increased militarism and “wolf warrior” diplomacy has met with global pushback. Members of the informal global “anti-CCP coalition” (Australia, Taiwan, etc.) have realized that Beijing’s “weaponization” of China’s markets through blocking imports and brand boycotts is much less effective than imagined, especially with allied nations willing to take over PRC demand and the Chinese people putting personal interests first over jingoistic nationalism in the case of Xinjiang cotton boycotts. Moreover, the Biden-Harris administration’s “sustaining” of Trump-era China policies (most are currently “under review”) instead of dropping them immediately signal to Beijing that the corner has not yet been turned in the Sino-U.S. “new cold war.” 

U.S. and international pressures aside, the CCP also faces a deteriorating economy, immense financial risks (implicit debt problems, bond refinancing issues, “platform economy” monopolistic practices, defusing the Ant/Alibaba situation, etc.), shrinking demographics, and the coronavirus pandemic (PRC vaccine efficacy, recent outbreaks in India and elsewhere threatening the mainland situation, etc.). Worse, Xi has to deal with the prospect of serious challenges against his rule from a coalition of domestic and foreign opponents, particularly between now and the 20th Party Congress in 2022. 

Black Swans are on the horizon in China this year as Xi struggles with a lethal cocktail of political, geopolitical, financial, and pandemic dangers.

“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University
Previous
Next