Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: The CCP Could be Playing the North Korea Card with Kim Jong Un’s Disappearance

◎ The following analysis was first published in the April 30 edition of our subscriber-only SinoWeekly Plus newsletter. Subscribe to SinoInsider to view past analyses in our newsletter archive.

On May 1, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, his sister Kim Yo Jong, and other officials attended a public red-ribbon cutting ceremony at a fertilizer plant in Sunchon. North Korean released photos and video footage of Kim and his entourage which Pyongyang watchers believe to be authentic. Kim’s May 1 public appearance affirms our previous analysis of his health status and lends weight to our analysis of the Chinese Communist Party’s role in Kim’s “death” and disappearance.

See our earlier analysis below.


On April 28, Daily NK News, a website that carries news from within North Korea, reported that a five-minute video claiming that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un had died during an on-the-spot inspection started circulating in the area of North Korea bordering China. The video also claims that Kim Yo Jong, the sister of Kim Jong Un and first deputy director of North Korea’s propaganda department, would succeed him. A North Korean source told Daily NK that the video “looks like it was broadcast by Korean Central Television (KCTV) and entered the country through China.”

On April 30, Daily NK quoted a North Korean source saying that North Korean authorities are “hunting down whoever brought the video over the border.” However, the authorities have not made a “centralized response” to silence rumors about Kim Jong Un, unlike in the past where the authorities would rapidly move to shut down speculation.

Kim Jong Un’s health has been the subject of intense speculation ever since he missed the celebration of his grandfather’s birthday on April 15. Kim has not been seen in public since April 11. A popular rumor being circulated is that Kim suffered a heart attack and is now either dead, comatose, or in a vegetative state after a botched surgery.

The South Korean government maintains that Kim is “alive and well.” Meanwhile, the Trump administration has released ambivalent messaging on Kim’s status. On April 24, United States President Donald Trump said at a press conference that a report that Kim is “gravely ill” is “incorrect.” On April 29, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News, “We haven’t seen him. We don’t have any information to report today, we’re watching it closely.” Pompeo added, “There is a real risk that there will be a famine, a food shortage, inside of North Korea too. We’re watching each of those things closely, as they have a real impact on our mission set, which is to ultimately denuclearize North Korea.”

Our take:
1. In the April 27 edition of our newsletter, we noted that “Kim might not be in such a bad condition as rumored” based on an assessment of how the CCP regime has responded to information about Kim Jong Un’s health.

Assuming that the Daily NK reports on April 28 and April 30 about the video of Kim’s death that entered North Korea from China are accurate, then we believe that the “Kim Jong Un health” incident could be the product of two possible scenarios.

In the first scenario, Kim has genuine health problems and the CCP is taking advantage of the “vacuum” in the Kim regime to achieve two broad goals:

  • In the April 27 newsletter, we noted that the CCP fears losing North Korea as an ally. To drive North Korea closer to the PRC, the CCP will find it beneficial to induce chaos and panic in North Korea by spreading rumors about Kim’s health status and “death.” Because the PRC has greater access to North Korea and Kim, the CCP would be among the first to know the actual status of Kim’s health and then abuse its informational advantage to influence North Koreans through disinformation.
  • We also noted previously that the CCP needs to manufacture chaos to keep the world distracted “so that it can put off being held accountable for the coronavirus outbreak and buy itself time to address its many domestic problems.” Thus, it benefits the CCP to spread disinformation about Kim’s health to keep the world on edge about the succession issue in North Korea and the fate of North Korea’s nuclear weapons. As the world focuses on North Korea, the CCP would hope that the issue of the coronavirus will be quietly “forgotten.” Also, should another crisis break out on the Korean Peninsula (especially a crisis involving succession issues and nuclear weapons), the U.S., South Korea, and Japan will likely look to the PRC to stabilize the situation, and would be less willing to adopt an overly confrontational posture towards the CCP.

In the second scenario, the PRC and North Korea could be collaborating in putting on a show to induce global chaos and panic in the world through a manufactured incident. Kim may or may not be having real health problems. To win Kim’s cooperation, the PRC could have promised to help North Korea with coronavirus issues and its food crisis; an April 28 Reuters report noted that a North Korean delegation was due to arrive in Beijing this week to “discuss food supplies and trade issues as the coronavirus pandemic has severely disrupted the country’s food supply.”

2. The CCP would believe that now is an opportune moment to play the North Korean card because U.S.-South Korean military readiness has been affected by the coronavirus and an impasse in a bilateral defense cooperation agreement that expired on Dec. 31, 2019 (Special Measures Agreement). The lack of a new agreement meant that U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) had to furlough about half of the 9,000-strong USFK Korean National employee workforce on March 31. However, President Trump told Reuters in an exclusive interview published on April 29 that South Korea had agreed to pay the U.S. more money for a new defense cooperation agreement. Regardless, the U.S. and South Korea are presently at a disadvantage to deal with a crisis on the Korean Peninsula given their disagreement, and this situation benefits the CCP.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University