Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Geopolitics Watch: Xi’s Europe Trip, the Sino-US Trade War, & Global Geopolitics

◎ The stalemate in Sino-U.S. trade negotiations has led to a stalemate in global geopolitics.

Edited on April 12, 2019. 

China’s Xi Jinping embarked on a six-day trip to Europe on March 21. He visited Italy, Monaco, and France. In France, Xi met with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker.

Xi’s trip comes amid extended China-U.S. trade talks and jittery global markets.

Our take:
The stalemate in Sino-U.S. trade negotiations has led to a stalemate in global geopolitics. We look at how China, the European Union, and the United States are coping with geopolitical uncertainty.

In his meeting with French President Macron on March 25, Xi Jinping said that major countries should find ways to get along with each other based on “independence, mutual understanding, foresight, mutual benefit and win-win outcomes.”

While meeting the heads of France, Germany, and the EU in Paris on March 26, Xi Jinping said that China and the EU should “increase positive energy” and that “cooperation is greater than competition.” On the same day, Huawei unveils its new smartphones at a Paris launch event.

1. Xi’s trip to Europe gives the Chinese regime a chance to address several short and long term issues and strategies.

In the short term, Beijing needs both leverage and a backup plan for the Sino-U.S. trade talks. The Trump administration has made it clear that there will not be further negotiations if the current round of trade talks fail. So Xi has to court Europe and build up trading relations in preparation for the worst-case scenario. Courting Europe also allows Beijing to drive a tougher bargain in trade negotiations with the United States. Success in Europe would give the CCP regime more confidence in the trade talks and in standing up to America over the long term amid the shift in the bilateral relationship from engagement to strategic competition.

Beijing also needs to court Europe to resolve the existential crisis facing its technology sector and reverse China’s economic downturn. The Trump administration’s moves against ZTE and Huawei have essentially barred the Chinese tech giants from breaking into the U.S. market. Also, senior U.S. officials have been cautioning allies and partner nations against adopting Chinese tech, particularly 5G, due to national security concerns. America’s efforts have disrupted the CCP’s 5G push at a time when the regime is counting on its tech sector to create a breakthrough for the worsening Chinese economy. The Party lacks viable channels to rescue the economy. The regime’s so-called “Internet Plus” model recently showed signs of unsustainability with Chinese internet company Meituan Dianping reporting huge losses and the closure of property unicorn Aiwujiwu. Meanwhile, depending on the housing market for growth is no longer an option with the collapsing of the once-hot property market. Further, tax and free cuts will end up increasing, and not decreasing, the financial burden of struggling Chinese enterprises. Given what’s at stake, it is no wonder that Xi Jinping made Europe his first foreign trip of 2019 and why Huawei chose to hold a launch event in Paris to coincide with Xi’s meeting with top EU leaders.

As we previously analyzed, survival and dominance are two sides of the same coin for the CCP. Courting Europe is in line with the Party’s ultimate agenda of global domination. The CCP will gain a crucial foothold in Europe if countries adopt Huawei’s 5G and join the Belt and Road Initiative. The Party will also try to divide and isolate EU member countries. For instance, the CCP could target European countries with severe debt problems first. In the long run, a fractured EU whose members are in China’s pockets will not be able to form an effective alliance with the U.S. to counter CCP expansionism.

2. The enforcement issue and structural changes appear to be the biggest sticking points of Sino-U.S. trade negotiations thus far.

Structural issues are very tricky for the CCP regime to handle. If Beijing refuses to compromise, it risks inviting crippling U.S. tariffs and sanctions. Most at risk are Chinese tech giants like Huawei, which faces the very real possibility of collapse should America go “all-in” on sanctions and bring the Meng Wanzhou case to its logical conclusion. Yet if Beijing compromises and cannot delay making structural reforms (circumventing a U.S. trade enforcement mechanism and other tactics), then the regime faces an existential crisis.

Breakthrough on the enforcement issue may come more easily. During a press conference in early March, Chinese vice commerce minister Wang Shouwen said that any enforcement mechanism between China and the U.S. must be “two way, fair and equal.” A two-way enforcement mechanism would help the CCP save face and swallowing other concessions much easier. If only China is forced to adopt an enforcement mechanism, the Chinese people will blame the Party for signing a humiliating “unequal treaty” and its political legitimacy will come under threat.

3. With the extradition process of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou set to move forward and the U.S. government’s deep skepticism of Chinese technology, Huawei will find it virtually impossible to expand in America. In fact, the company will count itself extremely fortunate if it somehow avoids further U.S. sanctions. Going forward, Huawei will likely shift its primary focus to the European market.

On March 12, the EU releases a strategy paper which labels China an “economic competitor” in key fields like 5G and political “systemic rival.” The paper also addresses the risks posed by Chinese investments in strategic sectors.

On March 22, French President Emmanuel Macron said during a press conference that “the period of European naivety is over” with regard to China. “The relationship between EU and China must not be first and foremost a trading one, but a geopolitical and strategic relationship,” he said.

On March 23, Italy and China signed a memorandum of understanding that makes Italy the first G7 nation to join the Belt and Road project. Both countries also signed $2.8 billion worth of deals (with a potential value of 20 billion euros). Earlier on March 9, U.S. National Security Council spokesman Garrett Marquis tweeted that the Italian government should not “lend legitimacy to China’s infrastructure vanity project.”

On March 25, France and China signed 15 business contracts worth billions of euros. Among the deals include a 1 billion contract for Électricité de France to build an offshore wind farm in China and the purchase of 300 planes from Airbus (about 30 billion euros).

1. Europe has traditionally aligned itself with America on China policy. Thus, despite misgivings about the Chinese regime’s economic and political maneuvers on the continent, European countries did not really pushback against China during the era of Sino-U.S. engagement.

As seen from the recent EU strategy paper on China and statements from European leaders, Europe has joined the U.S. in shifting its stance on China. Europe’s shift, however, currently seems to have been carried out more in speaking than in spirit given the flurry of deals that were hammered out during Xi Jinping’s Europe trip. A possible reason for the EU’s lack of conviction in forming a united front with the U.S. in countering the CCP threat could be unhappiness with the Trump administration. After all, President Donald Trump did impose some tariffs and threatened to levy more, demanded that NATO members pull their weight in contributing towards defense spending, and is seeking to negotiate a new U.S.-EU trade deal.

From Xi’s trip to Europe, EU nations are presently looking to secure their interests first and appear to be using China as a bargaining chip for dealing with America. From a certain perspective, it is understandable why some EU nations, especially those facing a debt crisis, are motivated to deepen trade and relations with China. Recent history, however, has demonstrated that the CCP is a rogue regime and cannot be trusted to strictly adhere to its side of the bargain. EU nations face very high levels of political risk in building closer relations with the Chinese regime.

2. Other U.S. allies also appear to be taking advantage of the global geopolitical stalemate to court China instead of holding firm with America.

On March 25, New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern said that she is traveling to Beijing at the end of the week to meet with Xi Jinping; New Zealand is a party of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. On the same day, Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe said that Japan could possibly join the Belt and Road provided that four conditions are met, according to Japanese news reports.

However, just like the EU nations, Japan and New Zealand will be playing with fire by aligning themselves too closely with the Chinese regime.

United States
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin are scheduled to travel to Beijing for trade talks on March 28. Meanwhile, Washington will receive a Chinese trade delegation led by vice premier Liu He on April 3.

According to a March 17 report in The New York Times, President Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, Robert Lighthizer, and other advisors recently huddled in a meeting to discuss “whether China is serious about offering concessions or if it was merely paying lip service to Mr. Trump.”

1. The U.S. needs a trade deal with China to reduce the trade deficit, resolve forced technology transfer issues for good, gain unrestricted access to China’s markets, restore optimism to the stock markets, and grow the economy. For Trump, securing a big win with China would bolster his 2020 re-election bid.

The biggest obstacle, however, remains the issue of implementing a working enforcement mechanism to ensure that the CCP sticks to the deal.

2. If the Times’s reporting is accurate, then the Trump administration still suspects whether China is negotiating in good faith. At the same time, the administration does not appear to want to miss the opportunity to strike a deal.

The CCP seems to have sensed Washington’s unwillingness to abandon negotiations when things look like they are “close” to being wrapped up. The Trump administration’s attachment to the deal has thus created an opening for the CCP to exploit with its classic delaying tactics.

America currently still has the upper hand in dealing with the CCP regime. But the U.S. will lose its advantage should the Trump administration continue to miss strategic windows of opportunity.

Get smart:
We correctly identified the present geopolitical stalemate in our 2019 special report.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University