Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: China’s Social Security and Taxation Changes Could Spark Wave of Business Failure and Unemployment

◎ The tax and social security reform will sharply increase the financial burden of Chinese firms.

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) revised China’s tax law on Aug. 31. At a glance, the revision seemed to be helpful. Individual taxpayers saw their annual tax-free threshold raised from 3,500 yuan per month to 5,000 yuan per month (60,000 yuan per year). However, in an overhaul of its income tax system, the Chinese regime would be handing over authority for collecting social security fees from local social security bureaus to local tax authorities in Jan.1, 2019.

The transfer of social security collection responsibilities means that over 70 percent of Chinese companies and their employees who paid less social security premiums previously end up paying more from the start of next year. Thus, the taxation and social security changes would result in employees being forced to take pay cuts or lose their jobs, and companies having to scale back operations or close down if fewer staff translates into lesser profits.

The backdrop:
March 2: The National Development and Reform Commission, the Supreme People’s Court, and seven other ministries and departments issued a decision to place “untrustworthy” people on restricted lists for airplane flights. “Untrustworthy” people include those who failed to make social security payments or fines, as well as other misdemeanors. The restrictions, which came into effect in May, were later applied to train passengers.

May 21: The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security releases a statistical report on the development of human resources and social security in 2017. That year, the state issued 3.8052 billion yuan in pensions while only collecting 3.3403 trillion yuan for the pension fund.

Aug. 31: The NPCSC revises the tax law. The law’s anti-avoidance clause would effectively heighten controls over high net-worth individuals.

Sept. 1: China begins to share tax information with other countries under the Common Reporting Standards (CRS) set forth by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. By operating under the CRS, the Chinese authorities would be able to collect and control that income of high net-worth Chinese living abroad.

Sept. 3: Mainland media reported that the local tax authorities in Jiangsu Province had demanded that Yuhua Glass Co. Ltd, a glass manufacturer in Changzhou City, pay taxes it owed from December 2007 to November 2017, which amounted to 2.01 million yuan. The Changzhou District Court ruled that the tax authorities could enforce the tax collection.

The big picture:
The changes to the tax law and social security collection come as the Sino-U.S. trade war continues to escalate and China’s economy keeps worsening. Local governments across China are facing debt troubles, and social unrest is on the rise.

Our take:
1. The PRC’s tax and social security reform will sharply increase the financial burden of Chinese firms.

Starting Jan. 1, 2019, local tax authorities in China would be tasked with collection social security premiums, including pension, medical insurance, unemployment insurance, work-related injuries compensation, and others.

According to a 2018 white paper on Chinese enterprises and social security, 31.7 percent of companies in China have been making social security contributions based on the lower limit of what is required for a worker earning a minimum wage regardless of the worker’s actual salary. Meanwhile, only about 27 percent of Chinese firms make social security payments that are wholly compliant with regulations. In other words, the other 73 percent of non-compliant companies will have to make more social security contributions to varying degrees and see reduced profits in 2019 after the tax authorities take over social security collection from the social security authorities.

According to mainland Chinese media, the combination of raising the annual tax-free threshold and stricter social security payment collection would see real wages fall by over 10 percent in the case of those who make a monthly salary of 5,000 yuan. Likewise, Chinese companies would have to bear an increased financial burden.

As seen from the table above, Chinese companies would be spending a total of 6,680 yuan on workers earning 5,000 yuan a month post-tax and social security collection reform. After-tax income of workers would be 4080 yuan, or a decrease of nearly 12 percent. Also, almost 41 percent of a company’s employment costs comprise of social security contributions and individual tax levies.

2. Based on current PRC regulations, the rate of social security contributions in China is much higher than in America and Europe.

Presently, employer social security contributions are calculated based on the employee’s average monthly salary from the previous year, while pension contribution is based on the total monthly wage of all employees. Employee salary includes bonuses, allowances, subsidies, and other forms of income.

Table 2 shows that Chinese institutions, work units, enterprises, social organizations, and employees collectively pay 42.8 percent of their pre-tax wage in social security contributions. (Individual enterprises pay a slightly lower rate [1 to 2 percent difference] depending on the locale.)

In comparing pension payments, companies in the West and other developed countries like America (6.2 percent), Japan (8.25 percent), Germany (9.3 percent), and even high-welfare countries like Sweden (9.25 percent) are required to make far less pension contributions than Chinese companies (20 percent).

In 2015, the average social security contribution rate of global enterprises was 16 percent. In comparison, Chinese companies make social security payments that are 2.7 times higher than that of global enterprises.

3. With increased taxation and stricter social security collection, Chinese corporations would see lesser profits.

According to China’s Ministry of Finance data from January to August, the national general public budget revenue was 13.2868 trillion yuan (9.4 percent increase YoY) while tax revenue was 11.7217 trillion yuan (13.4 percent increase YoY). In spite of the seemingly stellar growth numbers, China’s GDP for the first half of 2018 only increased by 6.8 percent from the previous year.

The general public budget and tax figures suggest that the PRC government is not helping companies alleviate their financial burden despite the worsening economic situation in China.

Source: China’s Ministry of Finance

And in the face of increased social security contributions, industrial profits are falling, at least when the official figures this year are compared directly with those issued in 2017 (see Table 4). While figures by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) show that total profits of industrial enterprises above designated size from January to July 2018 was 39.0381 trillion yuan, or a 17.1 percent increase from a year ago, it should be noted that the NBS recently changed the way it collected and calculated growth data (“according to a comparable caliber”). Using the previous method of calculation, however, reveals an 8.1 percent decrease in industrial profits in 2018 as compared to 2017.

Source: China’s National Bureau of Statistics
Source: China’s National Bureau of Statistics

State-owned enterprises (SOEs) notwithstanding, most enterprises in China are finding it harder and harder to survive as the country’s economy continues to decline and profits shrink. Overall, both private and public companies are seeing slim profit margins, with private firms taking only 5.3 percent and SOEs earning 7.7 percent in H1 2018. Amazingly, the PRC government saw a 13.4 percent increase in tax revenue from the previous year (see Table 3).

From Table 5, the total number of industrial enterprises above designated size decreased by 11,43o enterprises this year as compared to 2017, while firms that suffered a loss increased by 21,646 companies (up 47.6 percent from seven months ago). Meanwhile, the proportion of loss-making firms to all firms as of July 2018 (17.9 percent) is over 6 percent higher when compared to December 2017 (11.8 percent). Also, nearly 50 percent of the loss-making enterprises are private firms.

Profits-wise, SOEs saw an increase of 28.5 percent from a year ago, while private firms saw a decline of 27.9 percent. Also, while the profits of SOEs (119.132 billion yuan) exceeded that of private enterprises (102.151 billion yuan), the total number of profitable SOEs are less than 1 percent of private firms (see Table 5). This phenomenon is the result of the PRC’s “supply side reform,” which involves suppressing private enterprises and transferring their profit margins to the SOEs.

After the local tax authorities take over the responsibility of social security collection next year, the government could collect an additional 2 trillion yuan from all Chinese enterprises and individuals, according to an estimate by Guotai Junan Securities. This amount exceeds the private industrial firm profits and the net profit (1.95 trillion) of the 3,528 A-share publicly listed companies from January to July 2018.

We believe that the forthcoming stricter collection of social security contributions will cause plenty of headaches for enterprises in China. Small and medium-sized enterprises may find that they are unable to make social security payments from their annual profits, and may be forced to wind down. Wide-scale enterprise failure would lead to rising unemployment, which in turn leads to declining consumption and an ever-worsening economy. The intensification of local government debt problems and high unemployment would also result in sharper social tensions and protests across the country.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University