Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: The CCP’s Strategic Intentions Behind the Hong Kong Exchange’s Bid for the London Exchange

◎ We have reason to suspect that the CCP has strategic intentions behind the HKEX move for the LSE.

In early September, the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd (HKEX) made a surprise bid for the London Stock Exchange Plc (LSE). The LSE rebuffed the bid, and the HKEX ended its takeover attempt in early October.

We have reason to suspect that the Chinese Communist Party has strategic intentions behind the HKEX move for the LSE.

The backdrop:
On Sept. 11, the HKEX made an unsolicited, $39 billion takeover approach to the LSE. As part of the offer, the LSE would have to abandon a $27 billion deal which it was working on to acquire Refinitiv, a data and analytics company owned by Blackstone Group Inc and Thomson Reuters Corp. LSE shareholders would get 2,045 pence in cash and 2.495 newly issued HKEX shares. Further, the HKEX plans to apply for a secondary listing of its shares on the LSE if the deal is successful. A successful merger would see the HKEX become the main shareholder of the combined exchange with a 59 percent stake. The HKEX also sold the deal as a way of providing London with a major gateway to the Chinese economy. The LSE owns the Milan exchange and has a substantial U.S. presence through its FTSE Russell index subsidiary and its derivatives clearing house LCH.

On Sept. 13, the LSE rejected the HKEX’s bid on strategic grounds and said that it would instead continue pursuing its acquisition of Refinitiv. In a statement, the LSE noted that the HKEX’s valuation of it fell “substantially short” and that the “ongoing situation in Hong Kong” adds to shareholder uncertainty; massive and disruptive protests against a controversial extradition bill had been flaring in Hong Kong since June when the HKEX made its bid. “Accordingly, the board unanimously rejects the conditional proposal and, given its fundamental flaws, sees no merit in further engagement,” read the LSE statement.

On Oct. 7, the HKEX ended its takeover approach of the LSE. Under United Kingdom takeover rules, the HKEX cannot make another bid for the LSE for at least six months unless the LSE management agrees to an offer, another group makes a takeover bid for the LSE, or other events were deemed to be a material change in the LSE’s situation.

Our take:
Among the common explanations for the HKEX bid for the LSE include UK companies becoming cheaper with the pound weakening due to Britain’s inability to settle on a Brexit deal, and the HKEX looking to make a major overseas acquisition to overcome uncertainty at home over the Hong Kong protests.

The HKEX and the Hong Kong government are the only ones who know the real reason for the Hong Kong bourse’s sudden bid for the London exchange. Given the Chinese Communist Party’s ability to sway the Hong Kong government (a majority shareholder of the HKEX), however, we have reason to suspect that the CCP’s strategic intentions are behind the HKEX’s attempt to take over the LSE.

Here are some of the CCP’s likely strategic reasons for wanting a HKEX-LSE merger:
1. In the short-term, a HKEX-LSE merger around the People’s Republic of China’s 70th year anniversary on Oct. 1 would be great news for Hong Kong and China. The news of a successful merger would bolster both mainland and Hong Kong stocks, as well as deflect attention away from the Hong Kong protests.

2. In the middle-term, the CCP would want to stabilize the Hong Kong stock exchange, which has seen significant swings up and down as a result of global uncertainty over the Sino-U.S. trade war. A bid for the LSE, even an unsuccessful one, would create the impression of there being ample capital on the HKEX and being held by the Hong Kong government; given the links between Hong Kong and the PRC, international observers may also come to believe that the Chinese regime’s foreign exchange reserves and economy are still holding strong despite the trade war.

The CCP can ill-afford an underperforming HKEX over the medium to long-term. That is because many Chinese firms are listed on the Hong Kong exchange; there are 1,201 Chinese-funded corporate stocks on the HKEX (over 50 percent of the 2,395 companies listed on the exchange) comprising 68.3 percent of the bourse’s total market capitalization of about $3.9 trillion. The substantial mainland presence on the HKEX indicates that the Hong Kong exchange is simultaneously an important financial channel for Chinese companies and could easily be influenced or manipulated by the CCP.

3. Over the long-term, a HKEX-LSE merger benefits the CCP’s plans to dominate the globe (see the survival-dominance dynamic).

The LSE ranks among the world’s top 10 stock exchanges and is the second largest exchange in Europe. The LSE also wholly owns FTSE Russell, which covers 98 percent of the world’s investable market capitalization, and trades many government bonds, including U.S. Treasurys. Should the CCP gain control over the LSE via Hong Kong, it will gain access to data covering a sizeable chunk of global financial transactions and “expose” the workings of the Western financial system just when the PRC and the United States on the cusp of open “Cold War”-style conflict.

It is not beyond the CCP to make use of what it gained from a merged HKEX-LSE to pull off a financial “Pearl Harbor” attack against America, as well as target other Western countries.

Get smart:
If our analysis is accurate, then the CCP could be attempting one of the Thirty-six Stratagems, “obtaining safe passage to conquer the State of Guo” (假道伐虢), or borrowing the resources of an ally to conquer a common enemy before turning on the ally. Put another way, the CCP would attempt to ally or win over Western capitalists and countries to “borrow” their resources to later dominate the globe. But once the CCP becomes a global hegemon, all capitalists are in danger of being persecuted as the communist regime’s next “class enemy.”

Businesses, investors, and governments must carefully evaluate the political risks of doing business with China and not sacrifice long term interests for short term gains.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University