Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

The ‘Taiwan Card’ and its Role in US-China Relations

◎ From Beijing’s perspective, virtually anything the United States does with Taiwan amounts to playing that particular “card.”

By Joseph Bosco 

When two U.S. Navy destroyers passed through the international waters of the Taiwan Strait in early July, the head of China’s Taiwan affairs office accused Washington of “playing the Taiwan card.”

At the end of August, Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen made “stopover” visits to Los Angeles and Houston on her way to and from Central America. The Chinese Foreign ministry again protested, stating once again that the United States had “played the Taiwan card.”

From Beijing’s perspective, virtually anything the United States does with Taiwan amounts to playing that particular “card.” Those events were not the first Taiwan-related occasions when President Trump and his administration have displeased Beijing, starting even before assuming office with his acceptance of a congratulatory telephone call from President Tsai in December 2016.

When China protested, Trump took offense at anyone telling him whom he could talk to. He doubled-down on his defiance of Beijing by calling into question the One China Policy, the founding document of contemporary U.S.-China relations—and gratuitously linked it to the question of China’s own trade practices.

While the president said as a courtesy to Xi Jinping he would inform him before making or taking future calls and has not publicly acknowledged speaking to President Tsai since then, as Beijing sees it, his administration has continued to play the Taiwan card in other ways.

He approved a long-delayed arms sale package; signed without reservation the Taiwan Travel Act encouraging higher-level and more frequent Taiwan-US visits and exchanges; dispatched a moderately high-level delegation to the opening of the new American Institute of Taiwan’s office building in Taipei; and approved the high-visibility Tsai transits that took on many of the trappings of official visits.

Demonstrating the close U.S.-Taiwan security relationship, Tsai was invited to tour NASA’s Johnson Space Center which is officially off-limits to Chinese visitors. The not-so-subtle American message to Beijing: the Taiwanese president and the country she governs are not part of China.

Beijing invariably objects to any official, quasi-official, or even unofficial interactions between the United States and Taiwan which it regards as a mere province of China. But it especially resents Washington using Taiwan relations as leverage against China on trade or other issues.

This is however a bit rich, since Beijing constantly links one problem area against another in its range of disputes with Washington. The most notable example is North Korea where China has massive leverage over Pyongyang and turns the pressure on and off as it suits Chinese strategic purposes against the West.

For more than three decades, China has played the North Korea card quite adroitly to posture as a responsible international stakeholder. By using the North Korea crisis to keep Washington and its regional allies off-balance, it has succeeded in extracting one concession after another on its unfair trade practices, the East and South China Sea disputes, human rights violations and of course, issues surrounding Taiwan.

Beijing’s double-dealing on North Korea became blatantly obvious as the Trump-Kim Jong Un summit emerged as a real possibility earlier this year. For decades, it sloughed off Washington’s pleas that it pressure Pyongyang to end its nuclear and missile programs by saying it was a bilateral problem for Washington to solve.

When Trump took up the challenge, dealt directly with Kim, and seemed on the verge of a breakthrough, Xi Jinping suddenly took interest and showed his hand. He summoned Kim to Beijing and put a damper on the process. China, in its own way, wants to keep playing the North Korea card.

The Trump administration has quietly made clear to China that there is a host of actions favorable to Taiwan still available in the economic, diplomatic, and security areas. Each of those actions is not only a “card” that can be played to punish China for its many abuses and incentivize it to change its behavior.

More importantly, they are essential to the deepening of U.S.-Taiwan ties in all those areas and will be carried out on their respective merits. The Taiwanese need have no fear of being merely a pawn or “bargaining chip” in the overall US-China relationship.

The recent National Defence Authorization Act calls for an expansion and deepening of US-Taiwan military ties and even greater cooperation in enhancing Taiwan’s military readiness. The president signed it without reservation.

Beijing is on notice that, unlike previous administrations, President Trump and his national security team are more than willing to match the long-standing bipartisan pro-Taiwan sentiment in the United States Congress. China can no longer count on exploiting divisions between the executive and legislative branches. Instead, Congress and the President together have a whole deck of Taiwan cards waiting to be played. Washington’s leverage over Beijing works to Taiwan’s advantage.

First published in Taiwan Insight. 

Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the Secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He taught a graduate seminar on U.S.-China-Taiwan relations at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. He is a non-resident fellow at the Institute for Taiwan-American Studies.

Views expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of SinoInsider. 

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University