Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Biden Slips Further Back to Failed China Policies

Biden has edged back to the accommodation policies of the Clinton and Obama administrations.

◎ Biden has edged back to the accommodation policies of the Clinton and Obama administrations.


Last week, on the 72d anniversary of the People’s Republic of China, Secretary of State Antony Blinken sent a brief congratulatory message to “the people of the People’s Republic of China.” Some conservatives found the message inappropriate because of the regime’s many violations of international norms and because the Chinese people are essentially its captive victims. But Blinken’s message was similar to one sent by Secretary Mike Pompeo a year ago, except that Pompeo referred to “the people of China” and Blinken also called for cooperation “to solve the challenges we all face.”

Both statements were perfunctory, but on the PRC’s 70th anniversary the year before, President Trump tweeted to China with more personal warmth: “Congratulations to President Xi and the Chinese people on the 70th Anniversary of the People’s Republic of China!” Although Trump at the time was trying to strike a favorable trade deal with Beijing, his message triggered a spate of criticism from across the ideological spectrum of the Republican Party.

Then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that China under President Xi Jinping is a “modern version of Maoist China.” He criticized Beijing’s violence against pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong and its Uyghur internment camps and said Chinese Communist Party rule is “not just a tragedy for more than a billion Chinese [but] also a telling indicator of the threat the PRC poses to its neighbors.”

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) warned that “an authoritarian China is perhaps the single greatest threat to freedom around the world,” and Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) said the anniversary was “a day to remind ourselves of the horrors inflicted on the Chinese people over this time.” Sens. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) all dissented from Trump’s congratulatory message on the same grounds.

In a joint statement, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), House Republican Conference chairwoman at the time, and Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) said it was “not a day for celebration. … Since its founding, the People’s Republic of China has deprived its citizens of their fundamental human rights and human dignity.” They condemned the Chinese government’s “appalling record of repression.”

The dichotomy between Trump’s personal friendliness toward the Chinese leader and congressional opposition to Chinese government policies was also reflected within the Trump administration itself. While Trump focused on China’s trade and economic threat, virtually all his top officials, starting with Vice President Mike Pence, delivered a series of major speeches delineating the security and human rights concerns about the Chinese regime.

At the Hudson Institute in October 2018, Pence noted that Trump had “forged a strong personal relationship [with Xi], but I come before you today because the American people deserve to know…” And he proceeded to enumerate the challenges and threats presented by Communist China. “[S]oon after it took power in 1949, the Chinese Communist Party began to pursue authoritarian expansionism.” He laid out its behavior over the next seven decades taking advantage of American and Western goodwill and generosity, but never abandoning its aggressive intentions. He said “previous administrations all but ignored China’s actions — and in many cases, they abetted them. But those days are over.”

Over the next two years, Pompeo orchestrated a series of speeches by other Trump administration officials highlighting the vast landscape of Beijing’s strategic challenges to not only U.S. national interests and values but also the entire international order.

He led the charge with a sweeping condemnation of the Chinese Communist Party in his address at the Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in July 2020, where he said, “The old paradigm of blindly linking with China has failed. We cannot continue. We can’t go back this way.”

Some described the Pence and Pompeo speeches as declarations of a new cold war. There were powerful talks, as well, from then-national security adviser Robert O’Brien and his deputy, Matt Pottinger. Then-Assistant Secretaries Randall Schriver (Defense) and David Stilwell (State) also spoke out forcefully on the China threats within their domains. Even then-Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray weighed in with accounts of the internal threats emanating from China’s whole-of-government and whole-of-society assault on the United States.

Trump never made his own ringing declaration against China’s behavior beyond the trade area. He sometimes stepped on his appointees’ coordinated anti-Beijing messaging, but he did not suppress or actively repudiate his appointees for the sake of his relationship with Xi and a favorable trade deal. The two-track approach to China persisted throughout the Trump administration — until the COVID-19 pandemic soured Trump’s view of Xi.

President Biden, for all his policy differences with Trump, shares his proclivity to personalize international relations, especially Sino-U.S. relations, and assumes he possesses sufficient personal charm and ability to overcome obstacles to cooperation. He believes the Joe-and-Jinping rapport, cultivated for years before they became the leaders of their countries, gives him a unique ability to manage the relationship to America’s advantage — though Biden did throw down a marker by calling Xi “a thug” during the campaign to position himself on the  growing tough-on-China consensus.

The fallacy in this thinking is that America’s adversary is not an individual Chinese leader but a hardened communist system created by Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin and honed through generations of dictatorship.

In office, Biden has edged back to the accommodation policies of the Clinton and Obama administrations. After a recent 90-minute phone call with Xi, which Biden initiated, he allowed Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou to return to China. Trump’s Justice Department had her detained in Canada for lying about Huawei violating Iran sanctions.

Complicating America’s predicament, Biden, unlike Trump, lacks a national security team whose innate instincts and experiences place them in a default position of suspicion and opposition to “the Chinese Communist regime” — an expression that is not likely to pass the lips of any official in this administration.

Despite Blinken’s stated agreement with the Trump administration’s declaration that China is committing genocide against the Uyghurs, United Nations Ambassador Thomas Greenfield and White House spokesperson Jen Psaki have cast doubts on the Biden administration’s commitment to the finding. And Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo recently told the Wall Street Journal, “It’s just an economic fact. I actually think robust commercial engagement will help to mitigate any potential tensions.”

If the president and his subordinates fail to recognize the comprehensive existential threat that China poses, the underlying ideological basis for resistance that the Trump team built will be eroded. That relapse may be under way already.


First published in The Hill.

Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the Secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He is a nonresident fellow at the Institute for Corean-American Studies and the Institute for Taiwan-American Studies, and has held nonresident appointments in the Asia-Pacific program at the Atlantic Council and the Southeast Asia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Views expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of SinoInsider.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University