Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: Wuhan Coronavirus Death Count Could be 35 Times Higher than the Official Figure

◎ The following analysis was first published in the Jan. 30 edition of our subscriber-only SinoWeekly Plus newsletter. Subscribe to SinoInsider to view past analyses in our newsletter archive.

Updated on Feb. 1, 2020. 

According to mainland media reports on Jan. 28, the Wuhan Municipal Bureau of Civil Affairs announced that it would suspend charges for the cremation of those who died from the new coronavirus (including those who were suspected to have died because of the virus). The Bureau also requested support for the moving of corpses (including more funeral vehicles), as well as additional manpower and protective gear, from the Wuhan epidemic prevention command and the Hubei provincial department of civil affairs.

According to data released by the Hubei Health Commission, as of the end of Jan. 29, Hubei Province had 4,586 confirmed coronavirus cases and 162 deaths; Wuhan City saw 2,261 confirmed cases (49.3 percent of confirmed cases in Hubei) and 129 deaths (79.6 percent of deaths in Hubei). The provincial health authorities are also tracking 28,780 people who have been in close contact with infected persons and 26,632 people have been placed under medical observation.

Our take:
1. In studying official figures provided by the CCP regime, other open source information, and information circulated by Chinese citizens on social media, we have strong reason to believe that the regime has been grossly underreporting the number of confirmed cases and deaths caused by the new coronavirus. By conservative estimates, we believe that the actual death rate is 35 times or greater than the official figure.

A survey of the publicly available information on virus deaths and cremation in Wuhan paints a telling picture:
– On Jan. 20, the CCP officially acknowledged the existence of a new coronavirus that can be passed from person-to-person and that Wuhan is ground zero of the epidemic. That day, the Wuhan authorities said that four people had died from the virus; the authorities ordered a lockdown of the city three days later. On Jan. 29, the Wuhan authorities reported that there were 129 virus deaths—a suspiciously low figure in considering other information.

– According to reports in overseas Chinese language media, funeral homes in Wuhan are operating their cremation furnaces for 24 hours a day; previously, cremations are carried out only after 12:00 p.m. every day. Funeral homes are also reportedly short of funeral vehicles, personnel, and protective gear.

– According to other Chinese language media interviews and disclosures on social media, a total of 700 corpses from local hospitals were “disposed of” by funeral homes on Jan. 24; it is unclear how many of the “disposed” corpses belonged to victims of the coronavirus.

– According to an account this week by a person claiming to be a medical staff at an undisclosed Wuhan hospital, more than a hundred people die “every day” at their hospital (with the implication that the deaths are related to the coronavirus).

– According to a social media post published this week by a person claiming to be a worker at the Qingshan Funeral Home in Wuhan, “the number of dead bodies our work unit has hauled in the past couple of days has soared.” The person claimed to be “hardly able to carry on” and that the funeral home “does not even give us protective clothing.” The person also noted that “Wuchang Funeral Home and Hankou Funeral Home cannot hold any more corpses.”

– According to the Wuhan Bureau of Civil Affairs website, there are seven funeral homes in the city. In compiling publicly available data made available by the seven funeral homes, those funeral homes operate about 80 furnaces and cremate about 60,000 corpses each year. Hankou Funeral Home, one of the seven funeral homes, has 14 furnaces available, according to Hong Kong news website Initium Media. Hankou Funeral Home claims on its website that it has 30 furnaces, cremates about 20,000 corpses a year, and owns 20 funeral vehicles. If we presume that Hankou has 14 instead of 30 furnaces and carries out cremations for 300 days a year, then the 14 furnaces cremate nearly five corpses a day each. And if we presume that only half of Hankou’s 20-funeral vehicle fleet is in use, then each vehicle carries an average of seven corpses to the funeral house every day.

– In August 2016, Wuhan Evening News published an article about how cremation technicians have created a so-called “five-step combustion method” to shorten the average time of cremation from 50 to 60 minutes to about 45 minutes. Assuming that actual cremation time is double what the cremation technicians claim (90 minutes) and that only half of the 80 furnaces in Wuhan are working (40 furnaces), then the city can “dispose of” 640 corpses a day via cremation. This figure is close to the 700 corpses “disposed of” on Jan. 24, according to the account from media interviews which we wrote above.

– According to publicly available data made available by the seven funeral homes, the funeral homes cremate 60,000 corpses annually on average. After accounting for the average death rate of 200 per day (60,000 corpses divided by 300 days), there has been an increase of at least 440 deaths per day in Wuhan since the CCP officially acknowledged the coronavirus outbreak. That is, the increased death rate over the ten-day period from Jan. 20 to Jan. 29 could be 35.2 times that of the official 170 coronavirus deaths (as of Jan. 29), or 5,984 deaths.

– According to a Jan. 30 paper in British medical journal The Lancet, the paper’s authors examined 99 patients who were infected with the Wuhan coronavirus between Jan. 1 to Jan. 20 and found a mortality rate of 11 percent at the cutoff for the research study (Jan. 25). Michael Ryan, executive director of WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme, said that the fatality rate of known cases and deaths is around 2 percent. In extrapolating from 5,984 deaths between Jan. 20 to Jan. 29, the actual number of confirmed cases could be between 54,400 (11 percent mortality rate) to 299,200 (2 percent mortality rate).

2. In comparing central government and local government data on the coronavirus, there are obvious signs that one side or all sides are actively partaking in fraudulent behavior.

According to central government data as of Jan. 29, there are 7,711 confirmed cases (59.5 percent from Hubei) and 170 deaths (95.3 percent from Hubei) in China’s 31 provinces, as well as 81,947 people under medical observation (32.5 percent from Hubei). It is striking that while only about 60 percent of confirmed cases in China come from Hubei, over 95 percent of deaths occurred in the province. Because the Wuhan coronavirus is new, there ought not to be such a glaring discrepancy between the mortality rate in Hubei as compared to other provinces. There are several plausible reasons for this phenomenon: Other provinces have better and more medical equipment and treatment than Hubei, leading to vastly lower mortality rates; all provinces aside from Hubei are hiding their actual coronavirus confirmed cases and mortality rate; or the Hubei local government is hiding the actual number of confirmed cases, leading to an extremely high mortality rate.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University