Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: Did China’s Industrial Profits Really Grow 15% in Early 2018?

◎ The Chinese regime has long had a problem with issuing fake statistical data.

According to data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) released on May 27, profits from China’s industrial sector rose by 15 percent in the first four months of 2018.

A comparison of the official figures from 2017 and 2018, however, reveals a different picture.

The big picture:
China has carried out several deleveraging measures since the second half of 2017. Regulators have severely supervised financial institutions, cracked down on shadow banking, blocked channels to capital access, and are checking off-balance sheet risks of banks. And there has been a wave of corporate bond defaults this year in a financial environment where liquidity has been drastically reduced; the bond default issue is expected to worsen.

Meanwhile, a series of pro-trade U.S. economic measures (tax cuts, tariffs, Fed shrinking balance sheet and raising rates) has forced Beijing to also implement limited tax cuts and reduce corporate administrative costs. Despite Beijing’s measures, many foreign manufacturing industries continue to withdraw from China.

Our take:
1. In comparing the recently released NBS data with that from January to April 2017, it appears that China’s profits for the four months in 2018 was not a gain of 15 percent as announced by the NBS, but a drop of 6.6 percent. The other published figures also saw a decrease year-on-year, or a smaller gain than declared.

The main business revenue of industrial enterprises above designated size in 2018 dropped 9.6 percent from the previous year. In particular, revenue from manufacturing industries fell by over 10 percent, while private enterprises (where over 80 percent of China’s workers are employed) saw revenue decline by 15 percent.

Since this March, the Chinese government has said that it wants to reduce expenses for enterprises and slash taxes over 1.1 trillion yuan. From the above data, however, the drop in main business expenditure and revenue reveals a difference of less than 1 percent. This means that the drop in expenditure has nothing to do with the tax and expenses reduction that Beijing recently proposed, but rather is the result of businesses contracting as the economy deteriorates.

Private enterprises are seeing profits decline 5.4 percent more than the reduction in expenses, which indicates that it is becoming tougher for private companies to operate in China.

2. According to the NBS statement, the increase in total assets of industrial enterprises above designated size is 1.2 percent higher than the increase in total liabilities at the end of April. However, a comparison of 2018 and 2017 NBS data shows just the opposite. Total assets increased by only 2.4 percent while total liabilities grew by 3 percent, which suggests that businesses are having it rougher this year.

3. According to official data, the average payback period of accounts receivable is 45.5 days, which is a year-on-year decrease of 0.1 days. Meanwhile, the data for January to April 2017 shows that the average payback period of accounts receivable is 38.4 days, which means that there is actually a year-on-year increase of 7.1 days in 2018.

The fact that accounts receivable increased 7.3 percent from the previous year indicates that enterprises are seeing arrears in payment from upstream and downstream businesses. This phenomenon is in line with the wave of corporate bond defaults this year.

4. The Chinese regime has long had a problem with issuing fake statistical data. This January, two provinces admitted that their GDP figures from previous years were inflated by as much as 40 percent. Bearing the issue of fake data in mind, the comparison of 2017 and 2018 NBS figures on industrial enterprises above designated size shows that the Chinese economy is deteriorating, and that China’s actual economic situation may be worse than what the data indicates.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University