Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Risk Watch: Why 21 Chinese Provinces Cut Growth Estimates in 2018

◎ Twenty-one provinces are projecting lower growth as compared to their real GDP growth for 2017.

Chinese provincial governments have recently released their revenue targets for the year.

Twenty-one provinces are projecting lower growth as compared to their real GDP growth for 2017:

  • Beijing
  • Hebei
  • Shanxi
  • Heilongjiang
  • Shanghai
  • Jiangsu
  • Zhejiang
  • Anhui
  • Jiangxi
  • Shandong
  • Henan
  • Hubei
  • Hunan
  • Guangdong
  • Chongqing
  • Sichuan
  • Guizhou
  • Yunnan
  • Qinghai
  • Ningxia
  • Xinjiang

In particular, Yunnan projected a 2018 growth figure that is 1 percent lower than its actual 2017 GDP. Other provinces anticipating much lower growth this year include Chongqing and Zhejiang (both 0.8 percent lower).

Six provinces are expecting higher revenue in 2018:

  • Tianjin
  • Inner Mongolia
  • Liaoning
  • Jilin
  • Fujian
  • Gansu

Inner Mongolia (2.5 percent), Gansu (2.4 percent), and Liaoning (2.3 percent) anticipate substantial growth.

Another four provinces are targeting similar revenue figures as the previous year:

  • Guangxi
  • Hainan
  • Tibet
  • Shaanxi

In particular, Hainan removed targets for fixed-assets investment, industrial production, and GDP for some of its cities and towns.

The backdrop:

In June 2017, the Central Leading Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reforms approved of a plan for the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) to unify GDP calculation. The plan, which will be officially implemented in 2019, will see the NBS working with regional statistics bureaus to calculate regional and national economic data. Previously, regional governments and the central authorities compiled their data separately, resulting in sharp differences between the national GDP and the combined GDP of China’s provinces. The unified GDP calculation plan could further expose the problem of data fabrication in the provinces.

In July 2017, the twelfth central inspection group reported and criticized the governments of Inner Mongolia and Jilin of “falsifying economic data.”

In December 2017, the NBS revealed in a report that 10 towns and counties in Yunnan, Hunan, Jilin, and Chongqing had inflated their annual fiscal revenue by 1.549 billion yuan (about $245 million).

Our take:

1. In 2017, 21 provinces cut their growth targets for the year as compared to their real GDP growth in 2016. This year, 17 of the 21 provinces that projected lower growth have been doing so for consecutive years. Among the regions that have cut growth estimates for two years include key economic contributors like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang. This development suggests that local governments are not optimistic about the state of the Chinese economy.

2. The phenomenon of provinces lowering their 2018 growth targets lends further credence to our Jan. 14 analysis of why local governments are confessing to having fabricated GDP figures. Despite Inner Mongolia and Tianjin reporting that their 2016 GDP numbers were inflated by about 30 to 40 percent, a National Bureau of Statistics spokesperson insisted that the numbers fraud didn’t affect the official 2017 GDP growth figure of 6.9 percent.

3. We believe that regional governments are owning up to having falsified data and are now lowering their growth targets because they can no longer cover up the severe economic decline.

For instance, Shandong, the province with the third-highest GDP in 2017, issued an additional 97.8 billion yuan of government bonds that year. The Shandong government also secured 53.969 billion yuan in subsidies from the central government to cover up its fiscal gap.

4. The Chinese Communist Party, when faced with increasing danger, tends to repackage its danger as “opportunity” and pass the risk on to other parties. From this perspective, the CCP’s pledge at the 2018 Davos economic conference to open up China’s economy further to foreign investors is a sign that the economy is, in fact, not doing well.

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University