Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Three Key Takeaways from Trump’s China Trip

◎ Here are three key takeaways from Trump’s trip to China.


President Donald Trump visited China from Nov. 8 to Nov. 10 as part of his 12-day Asia tour. He was cordially received by Xi Jinping—highlights include a private tour of the Forbidden City and a tea session in an imperial building that was funded by the United States government under President Theodore Roosevelt. Both Trump and Xi gave face to each other, as evidenced by the deals and understandings which Trump got for the U.S.

Here are three key takeaways from Trump’s trip to China.

1. China and the U.S. are in sync on North Korea

During a Nov. 9 press briefing at Beijing’s China World Hotel, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that Xi and the Chinese delegation “have been very clear and unequivocal they will not accept a North Korea with nuclear weapons.” Trump and Xi also had a “very, very detailed exchange” on what the U.S. and China were doing about reining in the Kim Jong Un regime’s nuclear ambitions. On Nov. 11, Trump tweeted that Xi is “upping the sanctions” against North Korea.

The close Sino-U.S. coordination in Beijing stood in contrast to the situation in March when Trump tweeted in March that “China has done little to help” with the North Korean nuclear issue.

Our take:  

  • The People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK) belong in the communist ideological camp. Diplomatic relations between the two countries, however, has been lukewarm for the most part despite China’s very costly intervention in the Korean War.
  • Based on our research, the Jiang Zemin faction’s leading members have close ties with the Kim leadership. North Korea’s procurement of nuclear technology from China is the result of factional struggles inside the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
  • Xi Jinping’s attitude towards the two Koreas contrasts with previous Party leaders. Since taking office in 2012, Xi hasn’t visited North Korea nor received Kim Jong Un in China. Meanwhile, Xi has improved ties with South Korea and even invited the South Korean leader to his grand parade in 2015.
  • Shortly after Xi and Trump met in April, the U.S. applied military pressure on North Korea by deploying naval vessels near its waters. In September, China cooperated with the U.S. in enforcing tough United Nations sanctions against North Korea.
  • We believe that the coordination between Xi and Trump on North Korea suggests that Xi is abandoning the DPRK, the PRC’s communist bedfellow. Xi could eventually go on to implement startling political reform in China.   

2. Closing the trade deficit

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced that U.S. companies had signed $250 billion worth of business agreements and deals in China. The deals involve firms like Boeing, Caterpillar, General Electric, and Qualcomm, as well as agricultural products and natural resources products like soybeans and natural gas.

During a bilateral meeting and a press conference, Trump said that the massive U.S. trade deficit to China was caused by the “incompetence” of previous U.S. administrations instead of faulting China as per his rhetoric as a presidential candidate. Tillerson later explained Trump’s statement during his press conference.

Our take:

  • Many observers note that the $250 billion in deals doesn’t accurately reflect what Trump accomplished during this trip—some of the deals were previously agreed upon, while others are non-binding understandings, not business contracts. And Trump is still some ways from reversing the “$300 to $500 billion trade deficit” despite the slew of deals. But the deals lend the impression that Xi had given ground and face to Trump on the economic front.
  • Trump praising Xi and his not blaming China for the trade deficit coincides with our take that both leaders had earlier agreed to a deal benefiting both countries. (See our Sept. 14 brief.) So Trump will likely not pressure Xi on economic matters so that Xi can resolve the CCP’s internal issues and fulfill his part of their deal.  

3. Tackling the drug problem

During a press conference on Nov. 9, Trump said that he and Xi had discussed the “deadly drug trade” of China manufactured fentanyl into the U.S. which had destroyed “lives in the millions.” Trump added that he and Xi are focusing “very strongly” on tackling the issue.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, an estimated 20,000 Americans were killed by fentanyl in 2016. In August, Trump declared the opioid crisis a “national emergency.”

Our take:

  • The CCP has long been lax in supervising and regulating China chemical drugs and food manufacturers, resulting in having long-standing food safety and drug issues. Thus it is questionable if the CCP can tackle the export of opioids to China.
  • During the Second World War, the CCP grew opium in Yan’an and sold it to the Chinese in Kuomintang-controlled territories to finance their operations.
  • Trump and Xi didn’t announce the specifics of how they would tackle the opioid issue, but Xi will likely have some difficulty in implementing any anti-drug agreement. The Jiang faction, while weakened after the 19th Party Congress, is still largely in control of the CCP’s domestic security and legal apparatus that will be responsible for regulating China’s drug sales. 

 

"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University
Previous
Next