Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Blinken’s China Trip Yields Little Improvement in Sino-US Relations

Despite appearances, Secretary Blinken’s visit to China has not done much to thaw Sino-U.S. relations or change its current dynamics.

Despite appearances, Secretary Blinken’s visit to China has not done much to thaw Sino-U.S. relations or change its current dynamics.

United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveled to China on June 18. During his two-day visit, Blinken met with People’s Republic of China leader Xi Jinping, Chinese Communist Party Central Foreign Affairs Office director Wang Yi, and PRC foreign minister Qin Gang. 

The optics of Blinken’s trip looked bad for the U.S. and the Biden administration. The official PRC readouts seemed to suggest that the senior CCP officials had spent their time lecturing Blinken on why the U.S. was to blame for the deterioration in the Sino-U.S. relationship and how Washington should respect China’s interests. PRC state media photos of Xi and Blinken—including one where Xi was seated at the head of a large conference table while the U.S. delegation and PRC officials flanked him on either side—gave the impression that the latter played supplicant to the former. 

Perception, however, does not quite capture the reality of the current state of play between the U.S. and the PRC. An examination of the words and actions from both sides around Blinken’s Beijing trip indicates that the status quo of heightened tensions persists despite increased diplomatic engagements. 

‘Lowest point’
The CCP secured from Secretary Blinken’s diplomatic visit a propaganda victory of sorts. The senior PRC officials issued remarks suggesting that Washington was responsible for the worsening of bilateral relations and Beijing was the more reasonable of the two.

The “China-U.S. relationship is at the lowest point since its establishment,” said Qin Gang before expressing hope that the U.S. “will adopt an objective and rational perception of China, work with China in the same direction, uphold the political foundation of China-U.S. relations, and handle unexpected and sporadic events in a calm, professional and rational manner.”

Meanwhile, Wang Yi told Blinken that “the root cause” of Sino-U.S. relations having arrived at a “critical juncture” is “U.S. misperceptions toward China, which has led to misguided China policies.” Wang then demanded that the U.S. “stop playing up the so-called ‘China threat,’ lift illegal unilateral sanctions against China, stop suppressing China’s scientific and technological advances, and not wantonly interfere in China’s internal affairs.” Wang further added that there is “no room for compromise or concession” on the Taiwan question. 

After Wang and Qin’s “tongue-lashing,” Xi Jinping stepped in to show “magnanimity” and a willingness to work with the United States. “Planet Earth is big enough to accommodate the respective development and common prosperity of China and the United States,” Xi said. Therefore, both sides should “help make the world, which is changing and turbulent, more stable, certain and constructive.”

On the one hand, the statements by the senior PRC officials indicate that the CCP still firmly believes that the U.S. and its allies are out to “contain, encircle, and suppress” China, and Beijing needs to do all that is necessary to prepare for escalation in the “new cold war.” The CCP has long viewed the U.S. as its chief rival and leading obstacle in its quest for global hegemony, and will not be swayed otherwise. However, Beijing could become more accommodating to the U.S. should the Biden administration make substantial compromises, including removing U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods and ending restrictions on China’s access to advanced technologies. 

On the other hand, the Xi leadership has signaled that it will not heighten Sino-U.S. tensions as long as Washington does not cross the CCP’s “red lines” on Taiwan and its other interests. Notably, the PRC foreign ministry did not publish its spokeswoman Mao Ning’s strong condemnation of President Joe Biden during a regular press conference on June 21 when she was asked about the latter referring to Xi Jinping as a “dictator” during a fundraiser event on June 20. The censoring of Mao’s remarks about Biden and relatively restrained “wolf warrior”-style criticism of the U.S. by senior PRC officials indicate that Beijing was satisfied with scoring some propaganda points in China from Blinken’s trip and has no appetite to seriously provoke Washington and worsen its geopolitical straits. 

‘Right trail’?
In a press conference at the end of this China visit on June 19, Secretary Antony Blinken assessed that the U.S. had achieved the objectives it had set for the trip, including “establishing open communications channels, directly raising issues of concern, exploring cooperation in places where it’s in our mutual interest to do so.” President Biden also told reporters that he thought that the U.S-China relationship is on the “right trail” and Blinken had done “a hell of a job.”

Meanwhile, Blinken acknowledged that the PRC had not agreed to “move forward” with establishing “crisis communications and military-to-military channels” with the U.S., something which the Biden administration had been trying to accomplish since taking office. “Progress is hard. It takes time,” Blinken said. 

News reports suggested that the Biden administration had given up a lot in pursuing “intense diplomacy” with the PRC. A June 16 NBC report noted that the administration had been “slow walking” measures in recent months “from planned restrictions on investment in China to declassifying intelligence about the origins of the coronavirus” as officials “sought to mend relations with Beijing.” 

After his China trip, Blinken told NBC that the PRC spy balloon incident in February 2023 “should be closed,” while Biden indicated on several occasions around the period when Blinken was in Beijing that Xi Jinping had been “embarrassed” because he did not know about the whereabouts of the balloon at the time or what it was carrying.

The Biden administration, however, has yet (at least at the time of writing) to reverse its various tough China policies that are already in place. The administration has also not indicated that it would cease taking actions to “de-risk” from the PRC like applying more restrictions on China’s ability to access advanced technologies. As long as national security considerations remain a priority for the Biden administration, it will likely maintain its hawkish China policies and even add to them even as it pursues deeper engagements with the PRC. 

No détente
Despite appearances, Secretary Blinken’s visit to China has not done much to thaw Sino-U.S. relations or change its current dynamics. In fact, things are likely to take a turn for the worse in the future as both sides attach increasing importance to national security, the Russia-Ukraine war is not brought to a resolution satisfactory to U.S. interests, and China’s economy continues to deteriorate rapidly.

Greater geopolitical pressures on China will add to the CCP’s rising political risk levels at home, which will in turn increase the probability of Black Swan events. 

Search past entries by date
“The breadth of SinoInsider’s insights—from economics through the military to governance, all underpinned by unparalleled reporting on the people in charge—is stunning. In my over fifty years of in-depth reading on the PRC, unclassified and classified, SinoInsider is in a class all by itself.”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Unique insights are available frequently from the reports of Sinoinsider.”
Michael Pillsbury, Senior Fellow for China Strategy, The Heritage Foundation
“Thank you for your information and analysis. Very useful.”
Prof. Ravni Thakur, University of Delhi, India
“SinoInsider’s research has helped me with investing in or getting out of Chinese companies.”
Charles Nelson, Managing Director, Murdock Capital Partners
“I value SinoInsider because of its always brilliant articles touching on, to name just a few, CCP history, current trends, and factional politics. Its concise and incisive analysis — absent the cliches that dominate China policy discussions in DC and U.S. corporate boardrooms — also represents a major contribution to the history of our era by clearly defining the threat the CCP poses to American peace and prosperity and global stability. I am grateful to SinoInsider — long may it thrive!”
Lee Smith, Author and journalist
“Your publication insights tremendously help us complete our regular analysis on in-depth issues of major importance. ”
Ms. Nicoleta Buracinschi, Embassy of Romania to the People’s Republic of China
"I’m a very happy, satisfied subscriber to your service and all the deep information it provides to increase our understanding. SinoInsider is profoundly helping to alter the public landscape when it comes to the PRC."
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Prof. Ming’s information about the Sino-U.S. trade war is invaluable for us in Taiwan’s technology industry. Our company basically acted on Prof. Ming’s predictions and enlarged our scale and enriched our product lines. That allowed us to deal capably with larger orders from China in 2019. ”
Mr. Chiu, Realtek R&D Center
“I am following China’s growing involvement in the Middle East, seeking to gain a better understanding of China itself and the impact of domestic constraints on its foreign policy. I have found SinoInsider quite helpful in expanding my knowledge and enriching my understanding of the issues at stake.”
Ehud Yaari, Lafer International Fellow, The Washington Institute
“SinoInsider’s research on the CCP examines every detail in great depth and is a very valuable reference. Foreign researchers will find SinoInsider’s research helpful in understanding what is really going on with the CCP and China. ”
Baterdene, Researcher, The National Institute for Security Studies (Mongolian)
“The forecasts of Prof. Chu-cheng Ming and the SinoInsider team are an invaluable resource in guiding our news reporting direction and anticipating the next moves of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.”
Chan Miu-ling, Radio Television Hong Kong China Team Deputy Leader
“SinoInsider always publishes interesting and provocative work on Chinese elite politics. It is very worthwhile to follow the work of SinoInsider to get their take on factional struggles in particular.”
Lee Jones, Reader in International Politics, Queen Mary University of London
“[SinoInsider has] been very useful in my class on American foreign policy because it contradicts the widely accepted argument that the U.S. should work cooperatively with China. And the whole point of the course is to expose students to conflicting approaches to contemporary major problems.”
Roy Licklider, Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Columbia University
“As a China-based journalist, SinoInsider is to me a very reliable source of information to understand deeply how the CCP works and learn more about the factional struggle and challenges that Xi Jinping may face. ”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“SinoInsider offers an interesting perspective on the Sino-U.S. trade war and North Korea. Their predictions are often accurate, which is definitely very helpful.”
Sebastien Ricci, AFP correspondent for China & Mongolia
“I have found SinoInsider to provide much greater depth and breadth of coverage with regard to developments in China. The subtlety of the descriptions of China's policy/political processes is absent from traditional media channels.”
John Lipsky, Peter G. Peterson Distinguished Scholar, Kissinger Center for Global Affairs
“My teaching at Cambridge and policy analysis for the UK audience have been informed by insights from your analyzes. ”
Dr Kun-Chin Lin, University Lecturer in Politics,
Deputy Director of the Centre for Geopolitics, Cambridge University
" SinoInsider's in-depth and nuanced analysis of Party dynamics is an excellent template to train future Sinologists with a clear understanding that what happens in the Party matters."
Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor, International Christian University
“ I find Sinoinsider particularly helpful in instructing students about the complexities of Chinese politics and what elite competition means for the future of the US-China relationship.”
Howard Sanborn, Professor, Virginia Military Institute
“SinoInsider has been one of my most useful (and enjoyable) resources”
James Newman, Former U.S. Navy cryptologist
“Professor Ming and his team’s analyses of current affairs are very far-sighted and directionally accurate. In the present media environment where it is harder to distinguish between real and fake information, SinoInsider’s professional perspectives are much needed to make sense of a perilous and unpredictable world. ”
Liu Cheng-chuan, Professor Emeritus, National Chiayi University